Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Benchmarks

  1. #11
    Spicker's Avatar AKA jaigandhi5 BT Rep: +7BT Rep +7
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,413
    hmm peerzy thers something wrong with ur results...ur should be wayy higher...

    i got 305 with my samsung ram running at stock 200mhz and my cpu at [email protected]

    btw i did not tweak the ram timings or anything i can probably hit 350 or so...if i did some ocing to ram and etc.

    My Blog
    I'm still here.

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Hmm, i only got 10mb completed.
    current kb/s is 141
    resulting kb/s won't show. guess it's just that low

    athlon xp 2200+

    i wonder what a P4 1.7ghz would get on this? (equivelent price at time i boguht this processor).

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #13
    RPerry's Avatar Synergy BT Rep: Bad Rep
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Lakeland, Florida
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,268


    not as good as I expected, but I haven't done any tweaking to mine either

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #14
    Spicker's Avatar AKA jaigandhi5 BT Rep: +7BT Rep +7
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,413
    Quote Originally Posted by RPerry


    not as good as I expected, but I haven't done any tweaking to mine either
    the only tweaking u need to do is make sure u close all other programs before doing a benchmark

    My Blog
    I'm still here.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #15
    RPerry's Avatar Synergy BT Rep: Bad Rep
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Lakeland, Florida
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,268
    Quote Originally Posted by jaigandhi5
    Quote Originally Posted by RPerry


    not as good as I expected, but I haven't done any tweaking to mine either
    the only tweaking u need to do is make sure u close all other programs before doing a benchmark
    Thats not possible at the moment, so I'll just take the lower score, we all know it would benchmark higher than that, and I'm not looking for any cookies. Besides, Clockers would kick my ass regardless

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #16
    Spicker's Avatar AKA jaigandhi5 BT Rep: +7BT Rep +7
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,413
    Well lets change the game around...

    this will be the interweb's first bencmark contest that the winner is the person with the lowest score. The winner gets a big fat cyber cookie.

    so far ross is in the lead

    My Blog
    I'm still here.

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #17
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Quote Originally Posted by jaigandhi5
    so far ross is in the lead

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #18
    Duffman's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,071
    I got 297, w00t, w00t...
    ...

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #19
    fkdup74's Avatar Pneuberator.
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    3,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Peerzy
    Im rather worried by my score compared with yours Clocker, we all know 64 bit rawks but i didn't think it rawked so much it would nearly triple the score on my pc.



    Specs:

    Intel P4 3.4Ghz with HT
    1GB of PC3200 Ram
    Nvidia Geforce FX 5700 (256mb)

    All at stock.

    Not the best but only cost me £200 ($400).
    264 with a Sempron 2800+ (2 GHz) & 768 MB PC2700

    but....that leaves me out of the running for the cyber cookie

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •