Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Overclock my 2500+ or get 3000+?

  1. #1
    Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    249
    Hey Fellas,

    I have the money but which would be faster, a Barton 2500+ overclocked or a 3000+? I have four fans and Thermalright SI-97 to cool it down so I *think* I will be alright.

    Also, I just recently got another stick of RAM so I have a total of 1 GB now. Are 2 GBs overkill?

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #2
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,763
    Most 2500+ Bartons overclock to 3200+ speeds just by upping the FSB to 400. But be aware that not all will.

    2 GBs is overkill for most users. In fact, those RAM chips don't run as fast as most 512 sticks.

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #3
    lynx's Avatar .
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    9,759
    I seriously doubt you will find many new 3000+ chips anyway. Unless you mean a Sempron 3000+, and as far as I can tell that's only the same as the XP2800+

    You will almost certainly have to raise Vcore a little to run at 3200+ speeds, and that will boost your temps. But if you've got one now it's certainly worth trying as long as you are careful.

    Tell us what mobo you've got, some aren't too good at overclocking.
    .
    Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #4
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Sasage
    Hey Fellas,

    I have the money but which would be faster....
    It's totally down to the luck of the draw...a good 2500 can easily reach 3000 speeds and a good 3000 can absolutely scream, but neither chip, even upclocked till it bleeds, will compare to the newer 64-bit chips.
    I recommend you save your cash till you can move off the socketA platform altogether.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sasage
    Also, I just recently got another stick of RAM so I have a total of 1 GB now. Are 2 GBs overkill?
    Even the 939 platform has issues running 2GB (4x512MB) at top speed and your socketA is far more inefficient.
    Any improvement would be minimal and certainly not justifiable by a cost/benefit equation.
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #5
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,763
    Quote Originally Posted by lynx
    I seriously doubt you will find many new 3000+ chips anyway. Unless you mean a Sempron 3000+, and as far as I can tell that's only the same as the XP2800+

    You will almost certainly have to raise Vcore a little to run at 3200+ speeds, and that will boost your temps. But if you've got one now it's certainly worth trying as long as you are careful.

    Tell us what mobo you've got, some aren't too good at overclocking.
    Upping the Vcore isn't always needed. I have a 2500+ Barton running at 3200+ speed just by setting the FSB to 400. No other alterations other than good case cooling.

    It has been running continuously for about 1 year 24/7 under full load (folding).

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #6
    Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    249
    Well I was going to redo my thermal paste just to make sure it was ok, but then could I jump right up to 400 FSB or do I need to do the increments and test with Prime95 each step?

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #7
    Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    249
    I have a Abit nf7-s btw.

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #8
    lynx's Avatar .
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    9,759
    Ok, the NF7-S v1 and NF7-S v2 are good overclocking boards (the similarly named NF7-S2 is not) so you should be ok on that score.

    I personally wouldn't go straight for 400MHz FSB. I think you should go up in steps, although they can be fairly large, and check the full load temps for about 15 mins at each stage. As long as the system boots and the temps don't get excessive I wouldn't bother with Prime95 except as something to run full load.

    I can't remember how the Abit boards measure the clock. If they indicate 333MHz to 400MHz (ie DDR speed) I would make the jump in 22MHz stages. If it is 166 to 200 MHz then obviously the jumps need to be half that, ie 11MHz at a time.

    Once you've got where you want to go (or as far as seems safe), that's the time to start your stability tests. The fact that you've managed to get there usually indicates that the system is fairly stable. If it was going to fail Prime95 at an earlier stage then the chances of reaching your final stage would be pretty slim.

    If you redo the thermal paste you will have to run through several heat cycles over a number of days before it gives optimum efficiency, so it is probably better to leave it until you've got some temperature readings.

    Edit: just a thought, will your memory handle 400MHz? If not, you may have to run it asynchrously.
    Last edited by lynx; 06-21-2005 at 07:22 PM.
    .
    Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #9
    Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    249
    My mobo is the version 2.
    This is the RAM that I have http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820145416

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #10
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    The Corsair should easily handle a 200MHz FSB.
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •