Originally Posted by
vidcc
On what are you basing her article as having more weight than opposing articles?...has she carried out scientific studies ?
I believe her point is that, by dint of sensationalist sentiment created by Rachel Carson's book
Silent Spring, DDT was the baby that got pitched with the bathwater, so to speak, and never
was given it's due as an effective measure against malaria, which, in the beleaguered interim, can be arguably said to have needlessly cost millions of lives, as opposed to possibly a few thousand who reacted poorly to the DDT.
In a nutshell.
Bookmarks