I would like to argue something pretty important to me.

[DanB]

[RioDeLeo]

Loudest voices.... you crack me up Rio... you haven't a clue...

Try reading what l actually said, instead of your usual schoolboy rhetoric. l said "Minorities" play a huge part in Israeli politics, which they do. Your government is a coalition, at the moment between the two main parties, Labour and Likud, sworn enemies.

Party (translation in quotes, party leader in parentheses) - percent of vote by party -

• Likud Party ("Union") (Ariel Sharon - prime minister) - 29.4% (38 seats+ 2 seats of Yisra'el Ba'Aliya).
• Labour Party or 'Avoda-Meimad ("Labor") (Amram Mitsna) - 14.5% (19 seats)
• Shinui ("Change") (Yosef Lapid) - 12.3% (15 seats)
• Shas or Mifleget HaSfaradim Shomrei Torah ("Orthodox Sephardi Party") (Eliyahu Yishai) - 8.2% (11 seats)
• HaIhud HaLeumi ("National Union") (Avigdor Lieberman) - 5.5% (7 seats)
• Meretz ("Vigor") (Yossi Sarid) - 5.2% (6 seats)
• Yahadut HaTora ("United Torah Judaism") (Yaakov Litsman)- 4.3% (5 seats)
• Mafdal or Miflaga Datit Leumit ("National Religious Party") (Ephraim Eitam) - 4.2% (6 seats)
• Hadash ("Democratic front for peace and equality") (Muhammad Baraka) - 3.0% (3 seats)
• Am Ehad ("One Nation") (Amir Peretz) - 2.8% (3 seats)
• Balad or Brit Leumit Demokratit - Al-Tajamu' Al-Watani Al-Demokrati ("National Democratic league") (Azmi Bishara) - 2.3% (3 seats)
• Yisra'el Ba'Aliya ("Israel on the rise (also immigration)") (Nathan Sharansky) - 2.2% (2 seats). Now, part of the Likud.
• Raam ("United Arab List") (Abd al-Malik Dahamshah) - 2.1% (2 seats)

It's you who haven't a clue, and you live there. You have been caught out with your lies and bullshit throughout this thread. You answer the posts you think you have an answer for, whilst ignoring those that stuff you. You repeat the same old shit over and over. As l said before, you started this thread to make it look as though you give a shit about the Palestinians, when in fact you don't.

[tralalala]

Ummmmmm, why have I been caught out with that post of yours?

I never said only 1MP from religiouse party, I meant 1 from the worst party.
The ones I was referring to were Yehadut Hatorah - 5 seats as you put it... Hardly a say eh? They haven't been an influence on anything whilst in parliament. Shas however, do not want to kill all Arabs, and in fact, at one time wee willing to compromise on the disengagement. So, once again, as someone who doesn't live here - YOU are the one without a clue.


@SnnY: You are typing everything I wanted to say.... man, that's scary!!

[Busyman]

Ummmmmm, why have I been caught out with that post of yours?

I never said only 1MP from religiouse party, I meant 1 from the worst party.
The ones I was referring to were Yehadut Hatorah - 5 seats as you put it... Hardly a say eh? They haven't been an influence on anything whilst in parliament. Shas however, do not want to kill all Arabs, and in fact, at one time wee willing to compromise on the disengagement. So, once again, as someone who doesn't live here - YOU are the one without a clue.

Aww come on but, but, but.........Rio googled.

He can't be wrong.

[RioDeLeo]

Ummmmmm, why have I been caught out with that post of yours?

That's rather obvious.

I never said only 1MP from religiouse party, I meant 1 from the worst party.
The ones I was referring to were Yehadut Hatorah - 5 seats as you put it... Hardly a say eh? They haven't been an influence on anything whilst in parliament. Shas however, do not want to kill all Arabs, and in fact, at one time wee willing to compromise on the disengagement. So, once again, as someone who doesn't live here - YOU are the one without a clue.

Hindsight is a wonderful tool, isn't it?

Talking about right wing religious groups, Shas, who gained 11 seats certainly come under that heading, and they are the foruth largest party.

You can read about them HERE


@SnnY: You are typing everything I wanted to say.... man, that's scary!!

The same person maybe?

l'll tell you what Rafi, you read this book, and then make serious comments on it if you can. The book is about Jewish fundamentalism and it's effect on the Israeli political system. It might be a bit much for you as there aren't any pictures, but give it a go.

Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel - by Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky

[RioDeLeo]

Aww come on but, but, but.........Rio googled.

He can't be wrong.

1. Engage brain
2. Read what was written
3. Consider your reply
4. Post

[Busyman]

Aww come on but, but, but.........Rio googled.

He can't be wrong.

1. Engage brain
2. Read what was written
3. Consider your reply
4. Post

So that's how you do it.

1. Engage brain
2. Read what was written
3. Google for words you don't understand
4. Consider your reply
5. Consult Google again and maybe Ask Jeeves about it
6. Post with Googled links

Good one that man Rio!!!

[RioDeLeo]

1. Engage brain
2. Read what was written
3. Consider your reply
4. Post

So that's how you do it.

1. Engage brain
2. Read what was written
3. Google for words you don't understand
4. Consider your reply
5. Consult Google again and maybe Ask Jeeves about it
6. Post with Googled links

Good one that man Rio!!!

Unlike superior humans like you, l'm not divinely inspired, l need to learn, when l need a list l Google for one, and reprint it, why don't you tell us what you would have done in the same circumstances, oh superior being you.

[Busyman]

So that's how you do it.

1. Engage brain
2. Read what was written
3. Google for words you don't understand
4. Consider your reply
5. Consult Google again and maybe Ask Jeeves about it
6. Post with Googled links

Good one that man Rio!!!

Unlike superior humans like you, l'm not divinely inspired, l need to learn, when l need a list l Google for one, and reprint it, why don't you tell us what you would have done in the same circumstances, oh superior being you.

I don't give away secrets. Besides that, Google has proven your point to a T. I commend you.
However, it will never up innate intelligence....just the appearance of intelligence.
For every googled link to prove your point there is most likely a counter.

Keep it up and I'll think you a table member.

[RioDeLeo]

However, it will never up innate intelligence....just the appearance of intelligence.

How can a Google link give the cut\paster an air of intelligence? l could type the same list from any of a number of Cyclopedia, but why would you type that out one finger at a time when you can cut and paste the same thing?

For every googled link to prove your point there is most likely a counter.

That's the beauty of it, anything you say can be refuted, but the way to do it is to find a counter point, not rubbish the method of research.

Keep it up and I'll think you a table member.

l defy anyone on here to say they haven't used Google to garner information.