I would like to argue something pretty important to me.

[Busyman]

However, it will never up innate intelligence....just the appearance of intelligence.

How can a Google link give the cut\paster an air of intelligence? l could type the same list from any of a number of Cyclopedia, but why would you type that out one finger at a time when you can cut and paste the same thing?

For every googled link to prove your point there is most likely a counter.

That's the beauty of it, anything you say can be refuted, but the way to do it is to find a counter point, not rubbish the method of research.

Keep it up and I'll think you a table member.

l defy anyone on here to say they haven't used Google to garner information.

How much of it is correct?
Can one come to an accurate conclusion based on google all the time?
Does one google more than one source or settle for the first link?
Does said person crack open a book or pass their eyes by any other media source?

edit: I see you are European. Still not a Newcummer though.

[RioDeLeo]

How much of it is correct?

How correct is any other source of information?

Does one google more than one source or settle for the first link?
Does said person crack open a book or pass their eyes by any other media source?

You've answered your own post there, if you don't know the answer to those points you can hardly make a valued judgement.

edit: I see you are European. Still not a Newcummer though.

l'm African.

[bigboab]

How much of it is correct?

How correct is any other source of information?

Does one google more than one source or settle for the first link?
Does said person crack open a book or pass their eyes by any other media source?

You've answered your own post there, if you don't know the answer to those points you can hardly make a valued judgement.

edit: I see you are European. Still not a Newcummer though.

l'm African.

Which part of Africa?

[RioDeLeo]

l'm African.

Which part of Africa?

It's hard to say, as new evidence turns up daily, and is often disputed, here's an example .. Secrets of the Dead.

[MCHeshPants420]

Meh. All the cool kids are using Wikipedia these days.

[JPaul]

You answer the posts you think you have an answer for, whilst ignoring those that stuff you. You repeat the same old shit over and over.

When will the land be returned to the natives of North America, of Africa, of Australia and New Zealand. In fact everywhere else where it was stolen.

[GepperRankins]

Which part of Africa?

It's hard to say, as new evidence turns up daily, and is often disputed, here's an example .. Secrets of the Dead.

is this playing along with the europe thing?



i'd hate to side with billy dean, but STFU busyman. doing research is good. when i really want to find something out, i use google. i don't settle with the first link either. i check multiple sources. if it's a news story i'll check bbc.co.uk (i know it's only one source, but i trust it :liberalmedia: )

just because it's not read from a book doesn't make it any less valid you n00b.

[MCHeshPants420]

if it's a news story i'll check bbc.co.uk (i know it's only one source, but i trust it :liberalmedia: )

I use http://infoweb.newsbank.com

[lynx]

l'm African.

Which part of Africa?

The Australian part, apparently.

[lynx]

It's hard to say, as new evidence turns up daily, and is often disputed, here's an example .. Secrets of the Dead.

is this playing along with the europe thing?



i'd hate to side with billy dean, but STFU busyman. doing research is good. when i really want to find something out, i use google. i don't settle with the first link either. i check multiple sources. if it's a news story i'll check bbc.co.uk (i know it's only one source, but i trust it :liberalmedia: )

just because it's not read from a book doesn't make it any less valid you n00b.

I rather think that Busy's point was that google is a search engine, it finds results depending on what you ask it. Google has no interest whether the results it gives are either valid or true.

Try this link:
google
The first result provides "scientific evidence" that the moon is made of green cheese, but there are many more too. Your argument appears to be that since it is on google it must be true.