
Originally Posted by
RioDeLeo
What Zionist crap? If you have a particular point to raise, do so, generalising shows a lack of honesty.
All right, you posted this:
http://cactus48.com/truth.html
According this link the zionist movement were out to steal the arabs' land from the get-go, and you continued by saying that Israel was a zionist state, not a jewish state.
I called you on the credibility of the same link (I used sarcasm so you might not have understood it), as I've further critized the bulk of your links in this thread.
Is there anyone, apart from these radicals you seem so fond of, that distinguishes between judaeism and zionism and makes the same claims of the zionists, who are apparently running the place (given that it is, according to you, a zionist state) planning to do what you say?
In short, is there any actual proof, or is it all like that?
What the fuck are you babbling on about? Have YOU done any research? Can YOU state something different? All you do is argue with no other input.
And you've failed to answer the rest of it too, lynx and rat had to do that.
l have answered it, you just refuse to accept it.
Right, so you justified claiming that all settlers are thieves, and you explained why
you think they don't deserve keeping their land even if they've done nothing wrong, and you explained what you have against israelis in general.
Yes, and what was l supposed to do? l gave my opinion, you gave yours, (which you later claimed you were probably wrong!), what's your problem?
And, for the settlers that didn't steal anything from anyone, the analogy is definitely valid

International law is only your law, if your state recognizes it, ffs.
As Israel were members of the UN from 1949, isn't it fair to assume that they recognised it?
They obviously didn't, given that many of the current settlers own their land according to Israeli law.
So they were members of the UN but didn't recognise it ... is that your opinion?
EDit: and finally WRT the last quote, given who's got power in Palestine and what they've done in breach of all kinds of laws, why should Israel be expected to be any better wrt international laws?
Again, you generalise, what point are you arguing?
I generalize?
There's a good argument
You expect the Israel and israelis to follow international law, and you demonize them, but their enemies, whose rights you are happy defending are represented, and in part governed by choice, by a former terrorist organization.
Both sides have links to terrorism, not just the Palestinians, look at some of the members, past and present, of the Israeli government.
You don't see a problem with that?
If international law can recognize the authority of these people, given their past sins, why should Israel pay for theirs?
Ask the UN.
You seem well happy bashing the Israelis. But in this conflict bashing either side is easy enough, but what about defending the opposition instead?
WTF?
What makes the PLO any better, or more deserving to be protected by international laws than israel?
Who said they were? When you run out of ideas, bring other matters up as if l have defended them, very cute. l don't defend things l haven't claimed.
Bookmarks