Fat Secret Agent
NoOriginally Posted by vidcc
Well you think killing is wrong full stop...I am correct in this?
What is that supposed to mean.
Re your other "point"
Why would I only have one reason to hold an opinion. The fact that I find capital punishment morally wrong would not preclude me from having other reasons.
Fat Secret Agent
No matter how unlikely, it is possible.
Therefore "absolutely no doubt" does not hold.
there is no god
ok you think capital punishment is wrong full stop. so if it's morally wrong to execute the guilty why would you need to say it's wrong to execute the guilty because we might make a mistake an execute the innocent?No
Re your other "point"
Why would I only have one reason to hold an opinion. The fact that I find capital punishment morally wrong would not preclude me from having other reasons.
when is killing morally right then?
Last edited by vidcc; 07-30-2005 at 09:39 PM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Fat Secret Agent
ok you think capital punishment is wrong full stop. so if it's morally wrong to execute the guilty why would you need to say it's wrong to execute the guilty because we might make a mistake an execute the innocent?
when is killing morally right then?
The irony of vidcc spamming his own thread, because of being unable to post a cogent defence for an untenable position.
Fan-tastic.
there is no god
it's possible that he could switch places in front of the camera after being arrested at the scene or between being taken to lock up and trial.No matter how unlikely, it is possible.
Therefore "absolutely no doubt" does not hold.
take your rod and line elsewhere.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Broken
Recently, there have been a few people convicted with "No Doubt" evidence from experts and forensics that have been released due to the original evidence now being "Unsafe"...
Throughout the world, i have lost count of how many people have been released after new evidence came to light, however there was no doubt when they were convicted...
To take the life of another Human Being, in cold blood... is wrong. Even if found "Guilty" by a jury of his peers.
Eyewitness evidence is some of the most unreliable..ask any copper. Yet most are convicted on this.
Forensic Science continues to evolve... what was "Proven" with it 10 years ago, is now "Disproven" now.. With the same evidence.
Anyone that says "Proven without Doubt" is daft, unless they were there. And even if it is... the reason why must come into play. Maybe the guy wasnt "innocent", but escaped justice and the father caught up with him...
There are too many variables, even without the fact that we're civilised and should know better... the Death Penalty is just wrong.
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
Fat Secret Agent
Pas de rod, je ne fish pour le tiddler.it's possible that he could switch places in front of the camera after being arrested at the scene or between being taken to lock up and trial.
take your rod and line elsewhere.
there is no god
I see you are giving your fingers a rest and typing with your ass again..... nevertheless i would like to know when you consider killing morally right
The irony of vidcc spamming his own thread, because of being unable to post a cogent defence for an untenable position.
Fan-tastic.
Last edited by vidcc; 07-30-2005 at 09:54 PM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Broken
Its never morally right, sometimes its necessary.
If someone is convicted, then its no longer necessary.
Edit:
Morals are not universal.
Therefore, please read as "For Me" its never Morally Right.
Last edited by Rat Faced; 07-30-2005 at 10:00 PM.
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
Fat Secret Agent
Not when the victim is of no threat to anyone else. Which is what this (your) thread is about.I see you are giving your fingers a rest and typing with your ass again..... nevertheless i would like to know when you consider killing morally right
The irony of vidcc spamming his own thread, because of being unable to post a cogent defence for an untenable position.
Fan-tastic.
I see that you have gone from poor debate to cheap insult, it saddens me that you spammed your own thread.
Perhaps you won't be so precious the next time someone else does it.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks