Is he an illegal immigrant then?
I'm not saying no immigration at all, just that it should be controlled and we should have an effective way of recording, logging, following up and deporting when refused to stay
Smoke weed everyday
Is he an illegal immigrant then?
I'm not saying no immigration at all, just that it should be controlled and we should have an effective way of recording, logging, following up and deporting when refused to stay
effendi
He's not illegal and I thought you were saying that immigration is a bad thing. I do agree with what you write in so much as the administration leaves much to be desired.
Immigration gets blamed for a lot and the benefits are rarely mentioned.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Smoke weed everyday
But I said this :Originally Posted by manker
and then this:
We agree though so
Broken
In an interview with channel 4 tonight, the that Blaire guy at the met said that they had 250 incidents where they thought they were following a suicide bomber since 7/7
7 of these times, they nearly shot the suspect.
Bad time to wear a coat or carry a rucsack if your skin isnt white in London..
BTW: If they hit our economy/infrastructure, they are murderers... we hit theirs, its colateral damage... o-kay...
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
Fat Secret Agent
I feel the connotations are very different. I don't think I am being picky re the choice of words, I think it's important to understand what someone means and if you are unsure to ask. As such could you clarify what you meant by Israeli Tactics as I am now even more confused. If you can't be bothered cool.
Re your second, I can't think of anyone who condems such policies in Israel but supports them in England. You obviously don't believe me, like I said pas de problem.
You say "react to that comment" as if I were having a go at you, not the case I am genuinely curious about this duplicitousness you perceive, simply because I don't see it.
Smoke weed everyday
We don't mean to, they set out to
Fat Secret Agent
You see "colateral damage" as being analogous to suicide bombings on totally civilian targets.
I can't agree, most crimes are to an extent dependent on the intention of the person carrying out the act. I think this is the same type of thing.
Fat Secret Agent
I would say his skin was white mate.
Bad time to wear a coat or carry a rucsack if your skin isnt white in London..
I don't really see what your point is there.
Last edited by JPaul; 07-26-2005 at 07:21 PM.
Broken
During the 10 years prior to the invasion of Iraq, the US and UK were known to target water purification plants..
Many innocents were killed, not a military target, against the geneva convention.
Economic Targets are, and have always been legitimate targets, from the times the Tudors sent privateers to attack spanish merchant ships and earlier.
The "Target" was to bring the London Transport system to a halt. They achieved this.
If they just wished to kill civilians, then there are many other places that they could have bombed with timers/remotes, where they would not have been at risk.
As the target was legitimate, then the deaths are colateral damage.
Either that, or the US troops that went into Falujah are murderers as well... legitimate target (suspected militia), lots of innocents killed.
You cant have it both ways.
You cant declare a war and then say "But we arent playing unless you stand still and let us kill you, without you doing the same thing back"
Well, you can... but you'd be ignored..
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
Smoke weed everyday
But then there wouldn't be the glory of martyrdom would there
And your comment about the tube being a legitimate target is complete bollocks
Last edited by DanB; 07-26-2005 at 07:30 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks