Page 15 of 17 FirstFirst ... 5121314151617 LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 169

Thread: Innocent shooting

  1. #141
    manker's Avatar effendi
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    I wear an Even Steven wit
    Posts
    32,371
    Quote Originally Posted by DanB
    Ah, my bad for picking up on your spelling/grammar mistake
    That's fine.

    Just so long as the counter-sarcasm came thro' okay
    I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -

    --Good for them if they survive.

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #142
    JPaul's Avatar Fat Secret Agent
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    16,848
    SO19 Homepage if anyone is interested.

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #143
    whypikonme's Avatar Unemployable
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    233
    Wednesday August 17, 2005
    The Guardian

    The young Brazilian shot dead by police on a London tube train in mistake for a suicide bomber had already been overpowered by a surveillance officer before he was killed, according to secret documents revealed last night.

    It also emerged in the leaked documents that early allegations that he was running away from police at the time of the shooting were untrue and that he appeared unaware that he was being followed.

    But the evidence given to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) by police officers and eyewitnesses and leaked to ITV News shows that far from leaping a ticket barrier and fleeing from police, as was initially reported, he was filmed on CCTV calmly entering the station and picking up a free newspaper before boarding the train

    The documents reveal that a member of the surveillance team, who sat nearby, grabbed Mr de Menezes before he was shot: "I heard shouting which included the word 'police' and turned to face the male in the denim jacket.

    "He immediately stood up and advanced towards me and the CO19 [firearms squad] officers ... I grabbed the male in the denim jacket by wrapping both my arms around his torso, pinning his arms to his side. I then pushed him back on to the seat where he had been previously sitting ... I then heard a gun shot very close to my left ear and was dragged away on to the floor of the carriage."

    Full Story
    Sig Removed...too clever

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #144
    Barbarossa's Avatar mostly harmless
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Over here!
    Posts
    15,172
    The whole thing is a sorry mess. Somebody somewhere has fucked up in a big way, and has to be held accountable.

    But I don't know who.

    To shoot him while he was restrained, and clearly not carrying an explosive device, and so not a threat to the public, is obscene.

    In fact, it's murder.

  5. The Drawing Room   -   #145
    whypikonme's Avatar Unemployable
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    233
    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa
    The whole thing is a sorry mess. Somebody somewhere has fucked up in a big way, and has to be held accountable.

    But I don't know who.
    Why don't we start with the lying fucking police?

    They are the ones that came up with all this bullshit, to defend their actions, they should be tried for murder.
    Sig Removed...too clever

  6. The Drawing Room   -   #146
    manker's Avatar effendi
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    I wear an Even Steven wit
    Posts
    32,371
    Quote Originally Posted by whypikonme
    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa
    The whole thing is a sorry mess. Somebody somewhere has fucked up in a big way, and has to be held accountable.

    But I don't know who.
    Why don't we start with the lying fucking police?

    They are the ones that came up with all this bullshit, to defend their actions, they should be tried for murder.
    I don't think the police on the ground did much wrong. They had their orders and instructions so had little alternative to shoot him.

    They were ordered to shoot a suspect if positive ID had been provided and the suspect ran - he ran.

    They identified themselves by shouting 'police' yet he still advanced toward them. Could he have been carrying a small incendiary device? The officer who shot him certainly seemed to think so and I would say that he has specific training in this field.

    Given their orders and given the positive ID that they received, I cannot think too badly of them.



    Higher up the chain of command, tho', the people who issued the blanket statement 'Shoot the suspect if he runs' and the people who wrongly identified the man as Hussain Osman are culpable.

    Also, the cover-up and misinformation distributed by the police (one presumes) about him jumping the barrier, having a heavy coat on etc. -this needs to be dealt with in an official manner.
    I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -

    --Good for them if they survive.

  7. The Drawing Room   -   #147
    JPaul's Avatar Fat Secret Agent
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    16,848
    Was it the Police who issued the original version of what happened, or was that put together by reporters.

    It is unlike the Met to issue statements regarding this type of thing if they themselves have not held an enquiry

  8. The Drawing Room   -   #148
    whypikonme's Avatar Unemployable
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    233
    Quote Originally Posted by manker
    They were ordered to shoot a suspect if positive ID had been provided and the suspect ran - he ran.

    He didn't run, only when he got to the platform and the train was there with the doors open.

    They identified themselves by shouting 'police' yet he still advanced toward them. Could he have been carrying a small incendiary device? The officer who shot him certainly seemed to think so and I would say that he has specific training in this field.

    He was restrained, and was wearing a denim jacket, he in no way matched the other bombers.

    Given their orders and given the positive ID that they received, I cannot think too badly of them.

    What positive ID? The cop who was supposed to identify him was having a piss!

    A surveillance officer admitted in a witness statement that he was unable to positively identify Mr de Menezes as a suspect because the officer had been relieving himself when the Brazilian left the block of flats where he lived.
    Sig Removed...too clever

  9. The Drawing Room   -   #149
    manker's Avatar effendi
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    I wear an Even Steven wit
    Posts
    32,371
    Quote Originally Posted by whypikonme
    Quote Originally Posted by manker
    They were ordered to shoot a suspect if positive ID had been provided and the suspect ran - he ran.

    He didn't run, only when he got to the platform and the train was there with the doors open.

    Yeah ... he ran.

    ===

    They identified themselves by shouting 'police' yet he still advanced toward them. Could he have been carrying a small incendiary device? The officer who shot him certainly seemed to think so and I would say that he has specific training in this field.

    He was restrained, and was wearing a denim jacket, he in no way matched the other bombers.

    That doesn't mean he definitely wasn't carrying a bomb.

    ===

    Given their orders and given the positive ID that they received, I cannot think too badly of them.

    What positive ID? The cop who was supposed to identify him was having a piss!

    I'm going by the ITN news report that I posted earlier. It did say that they received positive ID at around the same time he started running. It would be foolish to think that only one person in the whole operation (the one that was having a slash) would be authorised to give a positive ID.
    ...
    I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -

    --Good for them if they survive.

  10. The Drawing Room   -   #150
    manker's Avatar effendi
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    I wear an Even Steven wit
    Posts
    32,371
    Quote Originally Posted by JPaul
    Was it the Police who issued the original version of what happened, or was that put together by reporters.

    It is unlike the Met to issue statements regarding this type of thing if they themselves have not held an enquiry
    It did run in all newspapers, so it's unlikely they all made up the coat and barrier leap story.

    I can only assume it came from an official source.

    Naturally, I stand to be corrected on that assumption.
    I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -

    --Good for them if they survive.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •