World trade center video

[Everose]

Nah, but thanks, Robs. Been to a lot of sites, read a lot of different conspiracy theories. Took some seriously, laughed at others.

[BigBank_Hank]

The afternoon of the morning the WTC gets decked, and this guy (who was, no doubt, a close personal friend of George Bush) has the wherewithal and foresight to round up a demolition crew (after all, they were just sitting around doing nothing, on 9fucking11) and pull together an act that would take weeks under any other circumstances, and knock his fucking building down.

Unreal.

After four years, you are still addicted to the smell of bullshit.

This is the most cockeyed conspiracy that has yet arisen from 9/11.

You know, if all of the events of 9/11 are the result of this conspiracy you put all your stock in, that means that Bush and the U.S. government control Al Qaeda, which in turn means that, ipso facto, diddly-doo, presto-chango, Bush and the U.S. (with a little hands-on help from Al Qaeda, and the willfully averted gaze of Tony Blair) are responsible for 7/7 and 7/21, not to mention 3/11, or whatever it was in Madrid.

It's a good thing your choir doesn't actually sing; you lot couldn't hit a right note to save your asses.

Umm wow I don’t think that I’ve ever seen J2 this fired up.

I originally didn’t post in this thread because I knew that the same thing would happen to me. No matter how hard you may try to get people to see things that are right in front of them if they don’t want to see it they never will.

[Busyman]

interesting read, but i don't believe it. i've heard that fire can weaken the metal, but not that much. remember out of about 100 tall steel buildings that have been on fire none have collapsed. i don't think there really was 25% "scooped out" of a third of the building, how the hell would they work this out, the many cameras didn't see it and i didn't see any sources to say how they knew this. even if fire and this missing section could cause the building to collapse, i doubt it could fall so neatly, and i doubt the building owner would lie about having it pulled down

Oh, absolutely, Dave.

The afternoon of the morning the WTC gets decked, and this guy (who was, no doubt, a close personal friend of George Bush) has the wherewithal and foresight to round up a demolition crew (after all, they were just sitting around doing nothing, on 9fucking11) and pull together an act that would take weeks under any other circumstances, and knock his fucking building down.

Unreal.

After four years, you are still addicted to the smell of bullshit.

This is the most cockeyed conspiracy that has yet arisen from 9/11.

You know, if all of the events of 9/11 are the result of this conspiracy you put all your stock in, that means that Bush and the U.S. government control Al Qaeda, which in turn means that, ipso facto, diddly-doo, presto-chango, Bush and the U.S. (with a little hands-on help from Al Qaeda, and the willfully averted gaze of Tony Blair) are responsible for 7/7 and 7/21, not to mention 3/11, or whatever it was in Madrid.

It's a good thing your choir doesn't actually sing; you lot couldn't hit a right note to save your asses.

Come on, sing along gang!!!

I Lovvvvvve Google!!!!

[Tikibonbon]

If Dave gets to be a demolishion expert online, I want to be a gynocoligist.

Hey Everose, com'r woman.....

[GepperRankins]

Oh, absolutely, Dave.

The afternoon of the morning the WTC gets decked, and this guy (who was, no doubt, a close personal friend of George Bush) has the wherewithal and foresight to round up a demolition crew (after all, they were just sitting around doing nothing, on 9fucking11) and pull together an act that would take weeks under any other circumstances, and knock his fucking building down.

Unreal.

After four years, you are still addicted to the smell of bullshit.

This is the most cockeyed conspiracy that has yet arisen from 9/11.

You know, if all of the events of 9/11 are the result of this conspiracy you put all your stock in, that means that Bush and the U.S. government control Al Qaeda, which in turn means that, ipso facto, diddly-doo, presto-chango, Bush and the U.S. (with a little hands-on help from Al Qaeda, and the willfully averted gaze of Tony Blair) are responsible for 7/7 and 7/21, not to mention 3/11, or whatever it was in Madrid.

It's a good thing your choir doesn't actually sing; you lot couldn't hit a right note to save your asses.

you kind of missed the point. which is, the building was rigged before september 11th.


the bush government created the modern al qaida that's responsible for all those attacks you mentioned, so whether they were false flags set up by the US government or they were by small groups of extremists. the US caused it by your so called retaliation to september 11th


so the lot of you can put away the champaign and the lube because you only agreed with me in that post

[Rat Faced]

interesting read, but i don't believe it. i've heard that fire can weaken the metal, but not that much. remember out of about 100 tall steel buildings that have been on fire none have collapsed. i don't think there really was 25% "scooped out" of a third of the building, how the hell would they work this out, the many cameras didn't see it and i didn't see any sources to say how they knew this. even if fire and this missing section could cause the building to collapse, i doubt it could fall so neatly, and i doubt the building owner would lie about having it pulled down

Oh, absolutely, Dave.

The afternoon of the morning the WTC gets decked, and this guy (who was, no doubt, a close personal friend of George Bush) has the wherewithal and foresight to round up a demolition crew (after all, they were just sitting around doing nothing, on 9fucking11) and pull together an act that would take weeks under any other circumstances, and knock his fucking building down.
Unreal.

After four years, you are still addicted to the smell of bullshit.

This is the most cockeyed conspiracy that has yet arisen from 9/11.

You know, if all of the events of 9/11 are the result of this conspiracy you put all your stock in, that means that Bush and the U.S. government control Al Qaeda, which in turn means that, ipso facto, diddly-doo, presto-chango, Bush and the U.S. (with a little hands-on help from Al Qaeda, and the willfully averted gaze of Tony Blair) are responsible for 7/7 and 7/21, not to mention 3/11, or whatever it was in Madrid.

It's a good thing your choir doesn't actually sing; you lot couldn't hit a right note to save your asses.

J2,

The video on the start of this thread has the owner and the firemen teling us on camera, that they demolished the building delibratly.

Doesnt matter what the "experts" say in this case... its a proven fact in court too.. it was delibratly demolished. See the Insurance Claims case.

Can i therefore thank you for your input, that the charges would need to be placed before 911.

I thank you for your change of stance on this, due to your refusal to accept anything that you dont agree with, including taped interviews with the owner/firemen on the subject, as evidence.

Nice to see that, due to the acknowledged legal evidence, and proven facts in court... you are now one of the conspiracy theorists.

Edit:

Shame Hank was so obtuse in his reply, it could be read as either agreeing with or disagreeing with J2 on this issue.

Maybe he actually watched the TV Interviews before commenting on them, unlike wor kev..

[GepperRankins]

consider yourself well and truly out pissed J2.

[Cheese]

My opinion is still out on this. But, unlike some of the lamers in this thread, I have watched this video.

[Skiz]

its a proven fact in court too

Proof?

See the Insurance Claims case.

Proof?

...the charges would need to be placed before 911.

Proof?

[GepperRankins]

they could get away with admitting demolition, but they don't try it.


if i was evil, i'd say "because of the sensitive nature of the information held within the building it was designed to be destroyed quickly incase of invasion or coup attempts" but nooooo