The Crime of "Unauthorized Reproduction"

[clocker]

Surely you are aware that this impetus which we call wasteful is bi-partisan in nature, and compels perhaps 95% of all legislative action?

And that is relevant how?
Did Sen. Miller have Democratic backers I am unaware of?

Face it j2, this is just another clarion call to Christian conservatives by a mush-headed politician (who, in this case, is indubitably Republican).
Even the good Senator in her wildest dreams could not have thought this proposal would bear fruit, but it is an excellent way to show that she hates queers, immigrants and any other non-white Christians as much as the powerful core constituancy of her party.

[backlash]

this is way out of control. I feel like this country is regressing right in front of my eyes.

[j2k4]

Surely you are aware that this impetus which we call wasteful is bi-partisan in nature, and compels perhaps 95% of all legislative action?

And that is relevant how?
Did Sen. Miller have Democratic backers I am unaware of?

Face it j2, this is just another clarion call to Christian conservatives by a mush-headed politician (who, in this case, is indubitably Republican).
Even the good Senator in her wildest dreams could not have thought this proposal would bear fruit, but it is an excellent way to show that she hates queers, immigrants and any other non-white Christians as much as the powerful core constituancy of her party.

I was making the perfectly reasonable point that the great majority of our legislators' activities are efforts expended in service of self-perpetuation or, as in this case, stupid, felt causes mis- or mal-perceived, and that the phenomenon of the impetus is not manifested in only one party.

I should add that the attribution of this quality exclusively to only one or the other of the two prevalent political parties in our country is indicative of a closed mind.

In other words, I am not accusing you of Ruthie-ness, but merely noting that your post was Ruthie-like.

[vidcc]

I was making the perfectly reasonable point that the great majority of our legislators' activities are efforts expended in service of self-perpetuation or, as in this case, stupid, felt causes mis- or mal-perceived, and that the phenomenon of the impetus is not manifested in only one party.

I should add that the attribution of this quality exclusively to only one or the other of the two prevalent political parties in our country is indicative of a closed mind.

This does kind of go against the right wings stance that the democrats are the party of NO ideas

[j2k4]

I was making the perfectly reasonable point that the great majority of our legislators' activities are efforts expended in service of self-perpetuation or, as in this case, stupid, felt causes mis- or mal-perceived, and that the phenomenon of the impetus is not manifested in only one party.

I should add that the attribution of this quality exclusively to only one or the other of the two prevalent political parties in our country is indicative of a closed mind.

This does kind of go against the right wings stance that the democrats are the party of NO ideas

I'm not quite sure what you intend that to mean in relation to my post, but the gist of it is ironic in that, if we ever suffer the ignominy of another liberal President, you will have absolutely no basis from which to claim relevancy for any subsequent remarks you will no doubt still feel compelled to make.

Well done!

[clocker]

I was making the perfectly reasonable point that the great majority of our legislators' activities are efforts expended in service of self-perpetuation

OKey-dokey.
Now, back to Sen. Miller and her reproductive purity act.

What do think of her?

[Busyman]

, if we ever suffer the ignominy of another liberal President,

What an idiotic statement in light of the current tenure of the President.

[Busyman]

I was making the perfectly reasonable point that the great majority of our legislators' activities are efforts expended in service of self-perpetuation

OKey-dokey.
Now, back to Sen. Miller and her reproductive purity act.

What do think of her?

Good luck clocker.

[j2k4]

I was making the perfectly reasonable point that the great majority of our legislators' activities are efforts expended in service of self-perpetuation

OKey-dokey.
Now, back to Sen. Miller and her reproductive purity act.

What do think of her?

I don't know her, I'm not familiar with her, and I don't have any compelling urge to wade through what must be a thoroughly misguided legislative effort, as it is easily and properly judged by it's surface components.

That she labels herself a Republican is unfortunate for the party, I'd say.

What do you think of Senator Robert Byrd, D-Virginia?

[Busyman]

OKey-dokey.
Now, back to Sen. Miller and her reproductive purity act.

What do think of her?

I don't know her, I'm not familiar with her, and I don't have any compelling urge to wade through what must be a thoroughly misguided legislative effort, as it is easily and properly judged by it's surface components.

That she labels herself a Republican is unfortunate for the party, I'd say.

What do you think of Senator Robert Byrd, D-Virginia?

Name some shit he's done.

edit: I know who he is. It's West Virginia and he's that fucking dick ass ex-Klansman that said he met "white niggers" on the news.

He is one good reason to keep affirmative action.