A hit back in about 1964/65Originally Posted by manker
Looking for loopholes
A hit back in about 1964/65
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum
effendi
A hit back in about 1964/65
In my head, I read your first reply as 'Gentleman Vic Reeves'.
Soooo ... I was thinking Shooting Stars or ... uh ... nevermind
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Manker's web totty
I've started on the tax return they sent back to us because information was missing.
I don't have a clue what they are on about.
Maybe they're looking for a bribe?
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
Get Les to look at it. You're doing WeeLes' homework like.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
Manker's web totty
Good point.
Now where did he go???
Looking for loopholes
Can I just point out that any attempted bribe would be viewed with a small degree of displeasure by HM's Inland Revenue and likely to be followed by the income tax form from Hell.
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
Tax needn't be taxing.
Yes it need be, cunts.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
re-member
BT Rep: +1
...as a friend of mine said, "..women should be pregnant and bare foot in the kitchen"..
I think ..they should be out working, so their better halves can relax with a Jupiler and a packet of Drum, on the sofa
Manker's web totty
I just don't get it
They sent us a form, which we filled in, then sent us the form back with a completely new form, saying they can't accept the original form because information is missing
WTF??
re-member
BT Rep: +1
..did you fill it in in red ink?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks