Hey, I've got an idea.
How about we change nothing in the code, but we tell them they have to wait two months. I bet that'd cut down on this kind of complaints.
Hey, I've got an idea.
How about we change nothing in the code, but we tell them they have to wait two months. I bet that'd cut down on this kind of complaints.
If he gave free invites he was trading. According to this board.
Presumably outside of the place he was supposed to do it. As he couldn't access it.
That's automatic moderation.
“It’s not the will to win that counts - it is the will to prepare”
The point was that if we tell them they have to wait for two months, but kept it at one month, they won't be logging in after 29 days and stuff like that and come complaining about no being able to get in since they've been members for "a month".
If they wait 59 days or whatever they'll be able to get in despite it saying they have to wait two months, like.
I guess tessco also could drop the actual requirement to 29 days, but keep saying a month.
Also, trading or giving away invites to strangers sort of defeats the point of invites on a lot of trackers where invites are meant to be given to trustworthy people you know. That makes private trackers less secure, and it's bad for the community.
Well you're never getting an invite from me with that kind of attitude, Mr so called Snee.
What, I've got a ratio and everything.
Agreed, norwegians are mentals. Always sounding so damned cheerful and clubbing seals, and whales.
Bookmarks