yeah mostly lower level trackers have much better staff then the ones with extraordinary exclusiveness,in sense of communication with members and understanding for their actions.That is one good example laid by IPT staff.
Member
BT Rep: +100
yeah mostly lower level trackers have much better staff then the ones with extraordinary exclusiveness,in sense of communication with members and understanding for their actions.That is one good example laid by IPT staff.
Give More...Take Less...Live Simple
GoaHead
BT Rep: +6
Well fuck you tooOriginally Posted by SAM
I was trying to not make a good thread into some grammar discussion, by adding something they couldn't correct.
(this post probably deserves an infraction, but well worth it IMO, so report away if you want)
Last edited by Blue_Skies; 04-02-2008 at 03:55 AM.
Member
BT Rep: +100
yea that deserves an infraction.have some sense put into this young man whose title is GoatHead and knows no manners.If you cant post something better,you should remain silent.
Give More...Take Less...Live Simple
Fst philosopher
BT Rep: +50
I don't report kids like you who can't control their emotions.but i'm happy that you get it out of your chest.Well fuck you too
I was trying to not make a good thread into some grammar discussion, by adding something they couldn't correct.
(this post probably deserves an infraction, but well worth it IMO, so report away if you want)
and more happy that you show people how childish you are.
by the way i meant nothing by my comment on your first post iwas just kidding with you.but you can't buy morals
For Serving Community
I realize that this is tangential, but since it appears to be a contentious issue, I can't resist trying to settle it properly.
Unknowingly is indeed a more accurate choice. If you did something, your will intended it to happen. If you invited someone, you did so willingly. The issue of whether it is known to you or not refers to your awareness of facts, not your desire to do an act. I'm sure you can see how the issue is really whether he knew that the invitees were cheaters, not whether he intended to invite them.
Peace guys, remember the context of this thread. Being nice is the key to dealing with other people efficiently. So thanks for posting such a wonderful example of kindness from powers of authority. I have received nothing but the kindest support from all staff of every tracker I've been a member of, so maybe I'm just lucky or maybe it is because I'm nice to begin with.
I
+1
e pluribus unum
Being nice certainly won't kill anyone.
And even if you'd like to ban that person's ass immediatly for inviting bad users or for trading invites, sending a PM with a standard nice text message (text you already saved on your computer hard drive) certainly won't kill you.
It's only 4 kb after all.
Live long and prosper.
★★★Need help?Ask★★★
BT Rep: +100
+1
BT Rep: +1
These guys have a tough job to do in policing all the scammers and cheaters. I'm sure the first 1000 'nice' notices they sent out and got ignored on made them think a notice with more 'fang' would be more seriously received. Even so, the notice is firm, but plenty polite in my opinion.
They didn't randomly ban the guy, just advised him and noted his file. Perhaps he should wipe his tears, thicken his skin and pay more attention to who he brings in. 1 cheater is a slip through but two raises an eyebrow. Remember, these jerks kill the goose for us all in the long run.
I think IPT is a pretty good beginner's tracker, and as such, they probably have more shenanigans to deal with than do the high level ultra-rare trackers.
Keep on keepin on, I says. Bravo IPT, keep your chin up.
Last edited by HarlanS; 04-02-2008 at 07:44 AM.
BT Rep: +3
Success goes to people's heads, thats probably what happens with some of these "high level" tracker staffs.
Nice of IPT staff to politely warn the user.
Ideally a user should enjoy torrenting and not feel like it's a drill.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks