fnar-fnarOriginally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
What if it's a wee HD TV.
I've got a 19 incher in my study room.
en seriousment tho', it'd probably look fine considering it's only a small tellybox.
spmado
BT Rep: +2
fnar-fnarWhat if it's a wee HD TV.
I've got a 19 incher in my study room.
en seriousment tho', it'd probably look fine considering it's only a small tellybox.
As long as I've got a face
You've got a place to sit
spmado
BT Rep: +2
it wouldn't be in hd tho', obviousment.
As long as I've got a face
You've got a place to sit
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
How can you tell if it's HD, I thought that was the resolution.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
pepper your angus
BT Rep: +10
there's no such thing as HD, they just turn the contrast up a bit and charge you an extra £50, 0000, 000How can you tell if it's HD, I thought that was the resolution.
spmado
BT Rep: +2
it is indeed the resolution, hd is classed as either 720x1280 (720p) or 1080x1920 (1080i/p)How can you tell if it's HD, I thought that was the resolution.
That thing you linked to doesn't do resolutions that high (it also uses analogue connections, which can't do hd, 'cept the vga) therefore it can't do hd.
As long as I've got a face
You've got a place to sit
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
Gotcha, it's the resolution and it's a digital rather than an analogue signal.
So my 19 inch widescreen (which is HD) would look OK with the highest resolution there, but it wouldn't be HD.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
spmado
BT Rep: +2
I'd say yes, it won't be hd but it'd be decent looking. I'm not certain tho' as I've never tried it.
At 1024x768 it'd be in 4:3 as opposed to 16:9 tho'.
As long as I've got a face
You've got a place to sit
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
The remote's got a button that has 4 options.I'd say yes, it won't be hd but it'd be decent looking. I'm not certain tho' as I've never tried it.
At 1024x768 it'd be in 4:3 as opposed to 16:9 tho'.
Original
4:3
Zoom (Fill Screen)
Widescreen.
That usually does a decent job, even if it isn't a WS broadcast.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
spmado
BT Rep: +2
The telly would probably stretch the image to fullscreen but it'd make everyone look fat.The remote's got a button that has 4 options.
Original
4:3
Zoom (Fill Screen)
Widescreen.
That usually does a decent job, even if it isn't a WS broadcast.
As long as I've got a face
You've got a place to sit
Error xɐʇuʎs
BT Rep: +1
Might be some graphical artifacts, lyke. But I've never tried that with anyhing wot wasn't already compressed and thus prone to having artifacts because of that as well. So I don't know for certain.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks