-
Linux Lover
BT Rep: +4
uTorrent for Windows and Azureus for Linux
-
-
04-13-2008, 01:57 AM
BitTorrent -
#12
Azureus if you have the RAM to spare otherwise µTorrent,me,i use Azureus, i like all the info that Az gives you and you can choose not have Vuze if you dont want it,it uses less RAM if you dont use Vuze
-
-
04-13-2008, 02:45 PM
BitTorrent -
#13
I'm staff,kiss m ass
BT Rep: +1
I prefer µTorrent for daily use, because Java is such a ressource hog, not only memory but also disk i/o seems to consume much more CPU
On the other hand, Azureus offers more options and graphs, diagnostic information as well as plugins.
-
-
04-15-2008, 06:10 PM
BitTorrent -
#14
Poster
BT Rep: +2
utorrent should use less RAM, though Azureus is also nice..
I use Azureus( i have enough RAM)
-
-
04-17-2008, 08:42 AM
BitTorrent -
#15
Poster
utorrent is better than azureus
-
-
04-18-2008, 05:24 AM
BitTorrent -
#16
in many years torrenting, utorrent is the one that uses less resources, but no torrent client has more options, plugins, extras than azureus has. It is the king of torrent clients, and i have used last 3 years utorrent, but once i switched to azureus, i'm not gonna return to utorrent.
-
-
04-18-2008, 12:16 PM
BitTorrent -
#17
Me too I won't go bak to utorrent
-
-
04-18-2008, 04:27 PM
BitTorrent -
#18
Poster
Azu FTW. I've been using it for a while now. Just wish you could ditch all the Vuze crap.
-
-
04-19-2008, 08:24 AM
BitTorrent -
#19
azureus has way more options.
-
-
04-19-2008, 09:49 AM
BitTorrent -
#20
deep funk
BT Rep: +5
https://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...azureus-116168
there's already a thread abput this topic.
of course nobody will read it and this post will be followed by people posting "utorrent is the best."
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks