500 Paedophiles To Be Tracked By Satellite Tags

[Illuminati]

Originally posted by cowswithguns+22 September 2003 - 16:20--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (cowswithguns @ 22 September 2003 - 16:20)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-chalice@22 September 2003 - 19:22
Attach the tag to their ankles.
Attach the tag to a chain.
Attach the chain to a bus.
Go downhill at speed.

*edit* We can all take turns driving the bus.
If anyone doesn&#39;t want to drive it, I&#39;ll take their turn.

Whilst I agree that any deterrent is worth trying......I feel that chalice has put perfectly my feelings on what to do with paedophiles.

I am interested to know what penalties would apply if a tagged offender was found to be in a &#39;high risk&#39; area. [/b][/quote]
Chain them to an F1

[internet.news]

Generally I would say it is a good idea...

but how you use it, it depends on each case...

thks :)

[mogadishu]

Originally posted by DrunkeNStylE@22 September 2003 - 07:41
id have to say i disagree on the taging technoligy just think of where it would lead upto soon every1 would be taged you know what i mean ho wwould you like walking aroun dsendin gout a signal in where you are watching everything you do at all times no than xthats sketche dout i think they just are usin gpedos for an escuse for testin gthe technoligy while informing the public its fo ra good cause eg. tracing pedophiles but in my personal onpinion i fyouve been convicted to a sex crim eon a child why in god name isn t heor she locked up forever ill tell y awhy cause theres too bloddy many o fthen take overnet for exampl ehave you used th eprogam id have to swear its a p2p dedicated towards the sharing of chil dporn with ove 500000 users (those are just the 1n swho can afford computer never min dall the junkies on the streets) in my personal opinion a pedophile should b eexicuted o rneutered there should b eno second chance for a pedophile thats the 1 thin gi hate most in this world

i think i agree with u.. cant really understand..

i think we all agree that paedophalia is really fucked up.. although i might not have as much of a perspective as some of the older members of the board. but anyway, i think that stuff like this is quite creepy and the fact the technology exists.. its scary. of course if this was the only use, it wouldnt be a problem, but im just afraid of what will happen when they start using it for other things.

[ZLOsiris]

a very touchie issue .... i would be all for it but then where does it stop ... i mean it could be opening pandoras box ..... pretty soon u could have people who have to many traffic tickets get tagged to make sure they dont speed. if its a voluntary i say more power to it but its got to stop there if it dont where will it stop.

[nikita69]

I have to agree with RF, big brother always gets in the way with sensetive issues like this. How about this:
Provide a bracelet or alike with a sat. tracking device to the child (can be removed if wantted to)
Insert in the body of the pedophile an object that will trigger the sat. tracking and the org which monitoring this kid upon coming close say with a 1-5 miles.

[MagicNakor]

I don&#39;t think paedophiles generally target the same child again and again.

[mogadishu]

Originally posted by MagicNakor@23 September 2003 - 03:11
I don&#39;t think paedophiles generally target the same child again and again.

yes, but they target the same age group. which is why they would keep them away from schools etc. but nonetheless i am still opposed to this idea.

[MagicNakor]

Originally posted by nikita69@23 September 2003 - 07:57
...Provide a bracelet or alike with a sat. tracking device to the child (can be removed if wantted to)
Insert in the body of the pedophile an object that will trigger the sat. tracking and the org which monitoring this kid upon coming close say with a 1-5 miles...

This sounds, to me, that they&#39;re tagging a specific child.