Which tracker is the safest?

[rubix]

thanks for the info guys i learned,though i m not on TL at the moment

......and you're happy about this because???

he learned something?

[Ac3Dunk]

I highly recommend Mango, best tracker ever, they are open for recruitment if you have at least proof of 2GB speed limit.

[RizKhan25000]

There is no safest tracker. It is a myth. All the internet traffic has to pass through lines, nodes, ISPs etc. No matter how much you encrypt it there is always a way to decrypt it. If the Governments want to find about a particular tracker they can do so very easily. But following are some guidelines to find a safer tracker!

1. First of all the tracker should not be a known P2L. There are quite a few sceners who are special enemies to such trackers.
2. Should not be very well known. Your precious SCT was one of the most insecure tracker on earth because every one seemed to be know its name and url.
3. The smallest the better. It is on the assumption that the Agencies would not waste time running tiny trackers but would rather go after the big names.
4. It should be harder to get in.

These four conditions do not indicate towards a safest tracker but they would help you to find a safer tracker.

[fringer]

There is no safest tracker. It is a myth. All the internet traffic has to pass through lines, nodes, ISPs etc. No matter how much you encrypt it there is always a way to decrypt it. If the Governments want to find about a particular tracker they can do so very easily. But following are some guidelines to find a safer tracker!

1. First of all the tracker should not be a known P2L. There are quite a few sceners who are special enemies to such trackers.
2. Should not be very well known. Your precious SCT was one of the most insecure tracker on earth because every one seemed to be know its name and url.
3. The smallest the better. It is on the assumption that the Agencies would not waste time running tiny trackers but would rather go after the big names.
4. It should be harder to get in.

These four conditions do not indicate towards a safest tracker but they would help you to find a safer tracker.

Do you think SCC meets these requirements?

[RizKhan25000]

SCC is a good tracker but you yourself know that it is a well known tracker. Anyone can find its url very easily. It is not harder to get in. But anyhow that is the case with most of the known trackers trackers. The same thing can be said about TL, GFT, HT, DDT etc. You should probably look for some secret tracker if you are experienced torrenter. If you can't find one then the safest prcedure would be to log in through a paid and reliable proxy system for downloading and browsing. I think such a thing is called VPN if I am not wrong.

[cherio]

any tracker can be safer with a seedbox. Xirvik comes with http proxy.

[cap87]

There is no safest tracker. It is a myth. All the internet traffic has to pass through lines, nodes, ISPs etc. No matter how much you encrypt it there is always a way to decrypt it. If the Governments want to find about a particular tracker they can do so very easily. But following are some guidelines to find a safer tracker!

1. First of all the tracker should not be a known P2L. There are quite a few sceners who are special enemies to such trackers.
2. Should not be very well known. Your precious SCT was one of the most insecure tracker on earth because every one seemed to be know its name and url.
3. The smallest the better. It is on the assumption that the Agencies would not waste time running tiny trackers but would rather go after the big names.
4. It should be harder to get in.

These four conditions do not indicate towards a safest tracker but they would help you to find a safer tracker.

so wrong

[ca_aok]

The only safe tracker is the one with a single member (yourself). Any time someone gets invited that you don't know in real life, your tracker is no longer safe.

If you can get invited to a tracker, don't you think an anti-P2P employee who gets PAID to get into these sites can do it too?

Yawn @ paranoia.

[sez]

Yawn @ paranoia.

you got that right.
ftwr closed because there was no motivation to run it.
Fort knox and sct,intentionally closed to conceal evidence to protect specific persons for possibly their own individual mistakes.
Where does this secure v/s insecure tracker debate come from?

[kukushka]

i think all "national" trackers are good enough as long as you're foreign to them