Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Ntfs Or Fat 32

  1. #11
    Wolfmight's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    5,545
    NTFS

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,377
    Originally posted by Mr. Blunt@12 October 2003 - 03:41
    From PC Magazine (Vol. 21 No. 19)

    As a guide: Use FAT32 if your hard drive is smaller than 32GB, or if you want to install more than one operating system on your computer. Use NTFS if you have a hard drive that is larger than 32 GB and you are going to run only one operating system.
    I'm dual booting between windows 2k and Xp pro, my partitions are ntfs, should i change these to fat32. (Partions size are 30/ 27.2GB)

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #13
    Out of The Ordinary
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    3,927
    I use FAT32 Myself but then again I know nothing about hardware

    BOT

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #14
    lynx's Avatar .
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    9,759
    Originally posted by Johnny_B@12 October 2003 - 02:04
    I have some questions too.

    Is it safe to convert from fat32 to ntfs? Will problems like data loss occur?

    Is it safe to convert from ntfs to fat32 using partition magic? I know ntfs is better, but I'm just curious.
    Why use partition magic to convert from fat32 to ntfs? Microsoft provide a perfectly usable command themselves.
    Simply use the 'Run' box and type "convert x: /fs:NTFS", where x is the drive letter.
    It will ask you to confirm the volume name.
    Since the drive is in use, it will not let you convert immediately, so it will ask you if you want to convert next time the system starts.
    .
    Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #15
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    491
    With Fat32 I always lost dls from kazaa, just disappeared, with NTFS I have yet to lose one...

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #16
    lynx's Avatar .
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    9,759
    Originally posted by Acecool@12 October 2003 - 12:04
    With Fat32 I always lost dls from kazaa, just disappeared, with NTFS I have yet to lose one...
    Good point, Acecool, that's because NTFS is a 'journalised' file system, which means any changes between checkpoints are logged, so the system can be returned to a 'safe' state. Non-journalised file systems can't do this, so they can only truncate the data which hasn't been finalised, which is what leads to the file corruption that causes lost downloads.

    I've only just converted my 'C' drive to NTFS, but because almost all data has been written to the 'D' drive, I haven't had any file system problems in the 2-3 years since I installed this system.
    .
    Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #17
    bowrabob's Avatar Reformed devo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    72
    Posts
    124
    I've tried both...I had modem problems with Fat32 and my system used to crash in games...NTFS is much more stable.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •