Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47

Thread: Fat32 & Ntfs?

  1. #11
    Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,044
    Originally posted by o_ICEMAN_o@18 October 2003 - 04:04
    Thx alot for the info peeps but i think i stick whit fat32
    good choice -

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #13
    sparsely's Avatar °¤°¤°¤°¤°¤°¤°
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    static hum
    Posts
    3,486
    some people have no sense, it seems....

    Why would you buy a ,nice new car body, with an old, out-dated engine.

    this post is guaranteed 100% parrot-free

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #14
    Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,044
    Originally posted by kurtsl0an+18 October 2003 - 04:09--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kurtsl0an @ 18 October 2003 - 04:09)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-exeus@18 October 2003 - 03:50
    but fat32 was first released with 95b so if you should still use fat32 you still use 95b........... or if you would like to use a new OS you should also use a new file system surely......
    new file system? NTFS? NTFS was introduced w/windows NT - hence the name - Windows New Technology, New Technology File System. [/b][/quote]

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #15
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    I really don&#39;t trust these new fangled file systems.
    I think they are all hype.

    The system that came with Windows BOB is by far the best...

    I need to defrag....
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #16
    abu_has_the_power's Avatar I have cool stars
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    6,447
    doesn&#39;t ntfs manage ur space and speed of hd better than fat? that&#39;s wat i heard

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #17
    Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,044
    Originally posted by Sparsely@18 October 2003 - 04:27
    some people have no sense, it seems....

    Why would you buy a ,nice new car body, with an old, out-dated engine.
    fat32 is leaner and faster than NTFS. if u want proof, just ask and i&#39;ll provide -

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #18
    Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,044
    Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@18 October 2003 - 04:36
    doesn&#39;t ntfs manage ur space and speed of hd better than fat? that&#39;s wat i heard
    hell no - just the opposite.

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #19
    abu_has_the_power's Avatar I have cool stars
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    6,447
    so ntfs sucks compared to fat32? cuz there used to be another thread here about this, and everyone agreed that ntfs rapes fat32&#39;s ass.

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #20
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    Originally posted by kurtsl0an+17 October 2003 - 21:37--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kurtsl0an @ 17 October 2003 - 21:37)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Sparsely@18 October 2003 - 04:27
    some people have no sense, it seems....

    Why would you buy a ,nice new car body, with an old, out-dated engine.
    fat32 is leaner and faster than NTFS. if u want proof, just ask and i&#39;ll provide - [/b][/quote]
    Okay, I&#39;ll bite....
    Prove it.
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •