I will agree that Tor is much like any other network...its only as good as it's weakest link. That being said, they have made some serious improvements in the speed of the network over the last 2 years and even over the last few months. After the botnet linked into tor, they made some changes that have sped things up even more. I havent checked in on them in a few weeks but I dont believe the 3.4 series is release yet. That is where some of the huge improvements were for my browsing. They may have pushed some of those into the mainline but i have not tested it out yet. I used tor way back in the day and you could expect to wait up to a minute for a page to load. The was partially because tor was slow and partially because websites didnt have any kind of optimizations to make it easier for tor to pull everything down.
Tor is significantly slower (still) than browsing plainweb but its easy enough to optimize a site for tor. Not to get on a sales pitch but if you check out the site and browse to a section that has covers, check out how long it takes for us to load the covers vs a site you normally browse. It probably wont knock your socks off if you are already using one of the top sites as they have probably done some of the general optimizations but it should be around 20% faster on average than a site optimized with a plainweb experience as its "marker". On average it takes me about 3-8 seconds to load a page including parsing the covers so yeah, its slower...but hopefully you have an automation system that takes out 90% of your need for browsing so that you can trunk it through the api and only have to login to the site every once in a while (which kind of kills the want for community but meh).
Side note: I'm either having issues with double-posting and having both posts getting moderated or I am somehow deleting my posts after I post...not sure which but whoever mods this post if you could just let me know so I'm not a nuisance.
Bookmarks