Bit Torrent

[Gre1]

NotoriousBic it's funny I don't see that upload rate going a notch looks like leeching to me.

[RealitY]

Originally posted by Gre1@12 November 2003 - 13:47
NotoriousBic it's funny I don't see that upload rate going a notch looks like leeching to me.   

Odd, 0.00, well...

[Johnny_B]

Originally posted by NotoriousBIC@12 November 2003 - 15:43
O I love these kinda topics  B)



Highest ever of course. Normally around 200 kB/s on well seeded torrents.

Upload rate: 0 kB/s
Uploaded: 0.00 MiB
Share rating: 0.000

WTF?

[junkyardking]

Originally posted by Johnny_B+12 November 2003 - 22:23--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Johnny_B @ 12 November 2003 - 22:23)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-NotoriousBIC@12 November 2003 - 15:43
O I love these kinda topics B)



Highest ever of course. Normally around 200 kB/s on well seeded torrents.

Upload rate: 0 kB/s
Uploaded: 0.00 MiB
Share rating: 0.000

WTF? [/b][/quote]
Thats not leeching there&#39;s 126 seeds and 3 peers.

[NotoriousBIC]

Setting the upload rate to 0 makes it unlimited.

And as Junkyardking says, there was not much left to seed with that much seeders around.

[BillyBongThorton]

looks like leeching to me...

[NotoriousBIC]

Oh dear, all out paranoia prevails.

Look at the picture.

Note a few things:
1. The time I have been connected (3min:29)
2. The fact that the torrent has NOT YET finished in this screenshot
3. The amount of seeders (126) against peers (3)
4. Settings are set to &#39;unlimited&#39;, which is the default setting for the original clients, the experimental clients AND Shadow&#39;s client.

Now why o why would a tracker assign a peer to give another peer file pieces when there&#39;s 126 seeders and the peers are prolly maxing out anyway?
No, the bittorrent protocol is much more efficient than that.

Please get the facts straight guys.

[Gre1]

Originally posted by NotoriousBIC@12 November 2003 - 21:08
Setting the upload rate to 0 makes it unlimited.

And as Junkyardking says, there was not much left to seed with that much seeders around.

There is always some to seed just add to the count set it to 5kb/s as long as u keep it open

@ junkyard king it doesn&#39;t matter how many seeders and leechers there are always seed for a while at least try to upload half of what u download.

[NotoriousBIC]

Umm Gre1, look at my previous post. I think you missed a few things...

[RealitY]

Originally posted by muchspl2+12 November 2003 - 12:31--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (muchspl2 &#064; 12 November 2003 - 12:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-REALITY@12 November 2003 - 18:48
Well http://www.2wire.com/ = QUACK&#33;&#33;
I got from 2,500.0 to 68,000.0 and everything inbetween...


May want to try http://www.pcpitstop.com/internet/default.asp
Seem more accurate...

2wire is the most reliable, don&#39;t know why you have trouble, you also can&#39;t fake it like your test by going forward and back wards in ie
of coarse you still have problems with shadows client also [/b][/quote]
Reliable????




Odd since PitStop it right every time, soryy 2Wire SUCKS...

As for Shadow, I use it from time to time, don&#39;t have a problem with it, just prefer Shareaza more...