Its That Time Of The Season Again

[mooseman2070]

Ooooooooohhhhh what could it be? "Fuck you, you motherfucking donkey-raping cock sucker!"? Or what about "Suck my balls you Chinese shemale whore!"?

The anticipation is killing me!

[Pitbul]

i acyually thought of going with an AMD CPU and MoBo but the only oen that i like is 700+ and thats just a tad to much out of my price range.

[Kunal]

Originally posted by Pitbul@26 November 2003 - 23:04
i acyually thought of going with an AMD CPU and MoBo but the only oen that i like is 700+ and thats just a tad to much out of my price range.

AMD, more than intel

mate go find prices on:

AMD Atlhlon 2500+ Barton
Asus Mobo

i assure you it will be lowr than your intel....

[clocker]

Originally posted by Pitbul@26 November 2003 - 15:04
i acyually thought of going with an AMD CPU and MoBo but the only oen that i like is 700+ and thats just a tad to much out of my price range.

$700?

You really don't need to buy the spare chip right away you know.

[Pitbul]

i talking about the FX 51 when i mentioned the 700 dollar CPU for those of you who didn;t know other then that i wasn't that intrigued by AMD's CPU's. comparing the 2400 and 2.4 P4 is like comparing a slightly weaker P4 2.4 counterpart to a true 2.4.

[3rd gen noob]

Originally posted by Pitbul@26 November 2003 - 23:20
i talking about the FX 51 when i mentioned the 700 dollar CPU for those of you who didn;t know other then that i wasn't that intrigued by AMD's CPU's. comparing the 2400 and 2.4 P4 is like comparing a slightly weaker P4 2.4 counterpart to a true 2.4.

you can't compare an athlon fx-51 and a P4 2.4 chip...it's a little unfair

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by Pitbul@26 November 2003 - 19:20
i talking about the FX 51 when i mentioned the 700 dollar CPU for those of you who didn;t know other then that i wasn't that intrigued by AMD's CPU's. comparing the 2400 and 2.4 P4 is like comparing a slightly weaker P4 2.4 counterpart to a true 2.4.

a little bit weaker, to save 150 dollars?

I think I would take the +150 dollars.

[Pitbul]

i knwo its unfair to compare them but thats really the only AMD chip i was interested but like i said they are expensive plus i wasn't really comparing them.

[ricochet]

Im not have as smart as all of you when it comes to hardware but why not the amb64 and not the 64 fx chip. the AMD 64 still beat the Intel P-4 3.2 chip without overclocking and its like US $300.00 cheaper...