Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 63

Thread: Increase Quality Of Mp3

  1. #11
    99shassan's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    787
    Suppose I was to change a track into a .wav file and then change it into an MP3. It wouldn't work if I convert it to a higher quality mp3?
    Changed SPAN settings in sig a YEAR after it was removed

  2. Music   -   #12
    Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Leeds - Yorkshire - UK
    Posts
    1,309
    NO if its already 128 bitrate you have lost the quality to start with and they is no way back plus every time you convert (wav mp3) it will lose more quality , thats life.

  3. Music   -   #13
    Afronaut's Avatar Xenu
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Teegeeack
    Posts
    3,688
    No it would not work. Atleast that im aware of.

    When you make a mp3, it will take away from the *.wav file.
    When you make a mp3 out of wav that has been allready
    done at 128, you would end up ripping the mp3 at first place,
    even if you rip to 192k or so.
    Its about taking away the things you would most likely not hear or miss in the Audio
    and making files smaller that mp3's are about.

    At least, i dont know of software that can Add to the song that's been ripped/reduced
    to mp3 allready.

    Software like Steinbergs WaveLab encodes the mp3 to wav when editing a song
    probably because it is a wav-editor, for example.

    Cheers:
    -GS-
    Spoiler: Show

  4. Music   -   #14
    Originally posted by Mïcrösöül°V³@3 January 2004 - 01:13
    i encode using Mp3pro at 96k. it sounds as perfect as any at 128 or higher that ive heard also i use musicmatch jukebox to do all my mp3's.
    Omg 96kb
    Ripping at 128k is crap
    For the love of god why 96k

  5. Music   -   #15
    Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Leeds - Yorkshire - UK
    Posts
    1,309
    Mp3pro at 96k
    Not Mp3 "pro" is the newish boy on the block with better compression rate not sure but that's about 160 mp3 rate.

  6. Music   -   #16
    Keikan's Avatar ........
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Edmonton (Not Enfield)
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,743
    empossible
    Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!

  7. Music   -   #17
    Afronaut's Avatar Xenu
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Teegeeack
    Posts
    3,688
    mp3 pro?

    No Thanks.

    It is not really a new standard, been a round for some time now.
    And i dont want to chance to mp3pro's, they are not as good as claimed
    in my opinion.

    Some time ago i downed Futurama-whole-season from Torrents,
    it was in .ogm format.
    I had to go through shitload of sites to learn about how to use 'em.
    Fair to say i got Pissed Off too.
    Im not against the format itself, im just a lazy guy who likes things more simple
    and easy.
    I should install this and that, move files there, make some registry entries perhaps etc. ,
    not yet today i have seen those episodes.
    Later i will look for better installer or some app that makes it possible
    to see the movies without 1 hour setting up things.
    MovieWorld is the first stop for me, im sure i get help in there.

    I like also mp3's better than mp3pro's, not oanly for the "sound of it",
    but mp3 is Teh Standard, period.
    I dont wanna chanche my setting everyday in my PC to see or hear some new files,
    but in the other hand, its cool to see someone is working to get Better Standards,
    im not against that, im just lazy.

    Cheers:
    -GS-
    Spoiler: Show

  8. Music   -   #18
    sparsely's Avatar °¤°¤°¤°¤°¤°¤°
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    static hum
    Posts
    3,486
    as far as alternative formats go, .mpc is really the best, with .ogg close behind.

    this post is guaranteed 100% parrot-free

  9. Music   -   #19
    muchspl2
    Guest
    basic rule of thumb nobody has really said
    shit in = shit out
    I don't see why it so hard for people to understand

  10. Music   -   #20
    Mïcrösöül°V³'s Avatar Hammer Smashed Face
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    who me?
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,613
    like spl said, if you rip a shitty quality song , then its gunna sound like shit no matter what bit rate you use. i have compared mp3 pro to mp3 and wav, using the same song, and ill be damned if i can hear any difference. 96k on mp3 pro is just more compression, but you aint gunna notice any difference between 96k and 128 or higher. i know, cuz ive tried it. sides, when you have 4000 mp3's on your comp, its nice to have them be just a little smaller to save space

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •