well i consider them sequals simply because they were made for money, the original matrix was an original story, the sequals were written and created purly for money [/b][/quote]Originally posted by junkyardking+13 January 2004 - 04:57--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (junkyardking @ 13 January 2004 - 04:57)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by Tetsujn@13 January 2004 - 06:29
Originally posted by EnJoi@13 January 2004 - 06:16
Originally posted by DWk@13 January 2004 - 06:48
Originally posted by junkyardking@11 January 2004 - 23:57
<!--QuoteBegin-Stonecoldfreak1@12 January 2004 - 06:16
no thats the real cover for now... they better change it because that is fucking horrible
The sequals were crap anyway, crap cover for a crap movie
Hey dumbass Reloaded and Revolutions weren't SEQUELS. The 3 movies are part of a trilogy
same difference
not even close pal. sequals are movie which continue a story that ended. a trilogy is one big story split in three parts. when we see a sequal it is the continuation of a story thought up a period after the previous one and is made to continue the saga but by no means finishing off the original story. sequals are mostly made for pure profit. not that all movie aren't but i can tell with trilogies people think up the story in a way where it could be told/viewed as one big movie and is connected with all the previous films in the most crucial areas.
its was always planned as a trilogy
Bookmarks