why? why not just put them in ur sig...?
edit: just noticed what it says in ur sig...not sure what the problem is though, you had these links in there before
and all u did was clean out some spyware, and u scores went up that much? a little fishy here
i sed (earlier) that that wasnt all i didOriginally posted by abu_has_the_power@29 April 2004 - 19:33
and all u did was clean out some spyware, and u scores went up that much? a little fishy here
geez uve got selective memory!
May's benchies will (hopefuly) be here by sunday
So ATI, are those good Aquamark scores?
Just trying to get an idea for comparison...
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
for my card? yes, clocker. they areOriginally posted by clocker@29 April 2004 - 20:40
So ATI, are those good Aquamark scores?
Just trying to get an idea for comparison...
@ adam: i intend on pushing 33500 with May's benchies however, my card will soon be obsolete. the geforce FX seriex and the Radeon 9x00 series will both fall into the grave come mid-may. but i will continue benchmarking mine anyway.
Excellent work with your signature.
If you remove the "under 100kb ( @ VB1234)" then you might have enough room to link your aquamark scores there without having to use this thread.
Also using shorter filenames would use less of your precious 600 characters.
thx VB. however, the bottom line is for announcements sooooooo...
IVE RELEASED THE MAY BENCHIE!!!!!!!!!!
Ok...lol Im still wondering why we all want to see a new aquamark score for your computer each month?
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@5 May 2004 - 12:30
Ok...lol Im still wondering why we all want to see a new aquamark score for your computer each month?
Its an ego thing.
Bookmarks