Internet.news

[Yogi]

Originally posted by Busyman@6 July 2004 - 13:33
What's to be admired?

Persistence in stupidity.

You are the expert on that, i believe......................



YoFool

[Yogi]

Originally posted by J'Pol@6 July 2004 - 13:37
The thing is that some of us find the way other people post can be really annoying sometimes, it is just one of those things that you have to accept. It is inevitable on a forum which has so many different types of people using it.

There is no way that you are going to enjoy what everyone else does, or the way in which they do it. IN just refused to show any concern for other people's feelings, he just carried on doing whatever He wanted. In spite of being warned.

Yogi did not like me posting loads of links to things which I found amusing / interesting and thought other people might appreciate. He therefore decided that I should post everything in one thread, which would improve his enjoyment of the forum.

It's just one of those things, we are all different.

You sensitive sod!!!!


I like the links!!! I have nothing to decide!!!

Just not 50 in a day in 50 topics............


(read my comments in the "where is j'pol" thread......)



Yogi

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by SensualBarfing@6 July 2004 - 12:57


Just not 50 in a day in 50 topics............

Yogi

Why is it your decision how many threads anyone else can start.

Everyone else has to put up with your self-indulgance, so why do you feel free to comment so readily on other people's posting choices.

As has been said many times, you didn't have to look in threads you didn't want to. It's not like my name doesn't appear at the start of them.

[TheRealDave]

how come when i asked this a while ago my topic was deleted with no explination? however this one stay?

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by TheRealDave@6 July 2004 - 13:07
how come when i asked this a while ago my topic was deleted with no explination? however this one stay?

How did you ask, was it in a civil and reasonable manner or were you a wee bit aggressive

[TheRealDave]

i was fairly polite stating my opinion that i thought he was a reasonable guy and was cureous as to why he was banned.

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by TheRealDave@6 July 2004 - 13:15
i was fairly polite stating my opinion that i thought he was a reasonable guy and was cureous as to why he was banned.

Then I have no idea, could it have been your rather curious spelling.

[Cheese]

Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004@6 July 2004 - 06:38
Internet.News seems like a nice guy. He is a member on me and Mike's forum.
Why was he banned from here?
I asked him once, he wouldn't tell me...others didn't know.

So why?

Is that Mike as in Gungrave?

[MicroScreen2]

i dont think the mods like us questioning decisions they aren't even sure about

[Yogi]

Originally posted by J&#39;Pol+6 July 2004 - 14:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J&#39;Pol @ 6 July 2004 - 14:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SensualBarfing@6 July 2004 - 12:57


Just not 50 in a day in 50 topics............

Yogi

Why is it your decision how many threads anyone else can start.

Everyone else has to put up with your self-indulgance, so why do you feel free to comment so readily on other people&#39;s posting choices.

As has been said many times, you didn&#39;t have to look in threads you didn&#39;t want to. It&#39;s not like my name doesn&#39;t appear at the start of them. [/b][/quote]
Oh, sweet Self-indulgence.........

Coming from you:


As i said: You sensitive (sad) sod................... :helpsmile:



Yogi


I like "exuberant"(J2K4) better..................