Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Windows Xp Pro....

  1. #11
    KazaaBoy's Avatar Nothing On The Moon.
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    354
    so the bigger the HDD the bigger space you loose.

    Idiots

    Thanks guys for that. It helped.

    BTW: I am looking for Norton Personal Firewall 2002 version but can't find it? The reason I am looking for these versions is because it's the best one I liked and worked perfect for me. Can you help me out?

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12
    Originally posted by KazaaBoy+6 July 2004 - 21:12--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (KazaaBoy @ 6 July 2004 - 21:12)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-jaigandhi5@7 July 2004 - 01:04
    i wud use partition magic as rossco said&nbsp; &nbsp;
    I did I put the space into one HDD and it worked. However, it says I have 187GB and not 200GB? Did I do something wrong? [/b][/quote]
    try using smaller cluster size. mine is set to 512 bytes

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #13
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Originally posted by jaigandhi5@6 July 2004 - 20:26
    lol someone shud teach em math
    lol, if they can make a hard drive, chances are they are pretty good at math.
    It&#39;s non-cheapness they gotta be tought.

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #14
    The size difference is usually because the manufacturers count a single gigabyte as 1000Mb, rather then the actual 1024Mb that it really is. This makes each hard drive slightly smaller then it should be.
    Geez I thought you people knew these things
    Q6600 @ 3.42Ghz | Gigabyte EP35-DS3R | EVGA 8800GT 721/1802/2006 w/ Accelero S1 | 4gb Crucial DDR2 @ 760mhz | 750gb Hitachi 7k1000 | Corsair 520HX | 2 x Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" | Windows 7 Ultimate

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #15
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Originally posted by kaiweiler@6 July 2004 - 21:12
    The size difference is usually because the manufacturers count a single gigabyte as 1000Mb, rather then the actual 1024Mb that it really is. This makes each hard drive slightly smaller then it should be.
    Geez I thought you people knew these things
    That&#39;s pretty much exactly what i said...mine was actually more detailed.

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #16
    Spicker's Avatar AKA jaigandhi5 BT Rep: +7BT Rep +7
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,413
    Originally posted by kaiweiler@7 July 2004 - 03:12
    The size difference is usually because the manufacturers count a single gigabyte as 1000Mb, rather then the actual 1024Mb that it really is. This makes each hard drive slightly smaller then it should be.
    Geez I thought you people knew these things
    geez i thought u cud read the post above the last one....
    j/k



    My Blog
    I'm still here.

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #17
    Originally posted by jaigandhi5+6 July 2004 - 22:22--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (jaigandhi5 @ 6 July 2004 - 22:22)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-kaiweiler@7 July 2004 - 03:12
    The size difference is usually because the manufacturers count a single gigabyte as 1000Mb, rather then the actual 1024Mb that it really is. This makes each hard drive slightly smaller then it should be.
    Geez I thought you people knew these things&nbsp;
    geez i thought u cud read the post above the last one....
    j/k


    [/b][/quote]
    Sorry, missed that one
    My mistake, I sure hope the death penalty has been disallowed...
    Q6600 @ 3.42Ghz | Gigabyte EP35-DS3R | EVGA 8800GT 721/1802/2006 w/ Accelero S1 | 4gb Crucial DDR2 @ 760mhz | 750gb Hitachi 7k1000 | Corsair 520HX | 2 x Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" | Windows 7 Ultimate

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #18
    Chewie's Avatar Chew E. Bakke
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,008
    Originally posted by KazaaBoy@7 July 2004 - 01:27
    BTW: I am looking for Norton Personal Firewall 2002 version but can&#39;t find it? The reason I am looking for these versions is because it&#39;s the best one I liked and worked perfect for me. Can you help me out?
    The Norton 2002 products aren&#39;t comapatible with WinXP so go for 2003. I&#39;ve used them (NPF, NAV, NIS, NSW) and they&#39;re fine.
    There isn't a bargepole long enough for me to work on [a Sony Viao] - clocker 2008

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #19
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,184
    Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004@7 July 2004 - 01:16
    nahh that&#39;s normal. Hard drive manufacturers don&#39;t meausre size right. They say that 1gb is 1000mb but in fact it is 1024mb, and that 1000kb is a mb, but it is 1024, and so on. This adds up to be quite a bit of lost space then tehre is also the space u loose (not much though) from the file system.

    My 40gb shown as 37gb
    Yes; this unfortunate mishappening is emphasized to a greater extent with RAID arrays. For instance, two 200GB HDDs being configured in a striped RAID-0 array, via NTFS formatting, consequences in an acceptable loss of 40GB, rendering you with 360GB of space.

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #20
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Originally posted by Amarjit+7 July 2004 - 11:26--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Amarjit @ 7 July 2004 - 11:26)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-ROSSCO_2004@7 July 2004 - 01:16
    nahh that&#39;s normal. Hard drive manufacturers don&#39;t meausre size right. They say that 1gb is 1000mb but in fact it is 1024mb, and that 1000kb is a mb, but it is 1024, and so on. This adds up to be quite a bit of lost space then tehre is also the space u loose (not much though) from the file system.

    My 40gb shown as 37gb
    Yes; this unfortunate mishappening is emphasized to a greater extent with RAID arrays. For instance, two 200GB HDDs being configured in a striped RAID-0 array, via NTFS formatting, consequences in an acceptable loss of 40GB, rendering you with 360GB of space. [/b][/quote]
    imagine when 1tb drives are out, then how muc will u loose? (too tired to do the math).

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •