The Perfect Videogame!

[Spicker]

Originally posted by MicroScreen2@27 July 2004 - 21:05
i thought the mutants in farcry made the game tacky.

im stuck at one of the levels where the mutants are....
im sure i can beat the level but...im scared :helpsmile: :helpsmile:

[Ninja Monkey]

Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@27 July 2004 - 22:48
eventually, it would simulate the matrix program. a game so real that u're in it. then u can switch time periods and play all kinds of heros and kings and other stuff. virtual sex so real that u fell everyhting is also where future gaming will eventually lead to.

Yeah, that would be pretty sweet. I think I'd exclude the time traveling thing and give it a setting kind of like Star Wars only with more meelee weopons, and cooler magic like summoning and shapeshifting. One of the obvious problems with this virtual world would be it's EXTREME addictiveness, but i have formed a kickass idea. It would automatically shutdown once you've been on for an unhealthy amount of time with a warning 10 seconds in advance. But the more exercise you got, the more time you could spend. For example, a fat loser laying around all the time doing nothing physical would only spend about an hour a day before it told him to get of his fat lazy butt, while one who intensly disciplined himself daily could spend up to eight. Think it would work?

[Spicker]

Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@27 July 2004 - 23:48
eventually, it would simulate the matrix program. a game so real that u're in it. then u can switch time periods and play all kinds of heros and kings and other stuff. virtual sex so real that u fell everyhting is also where future gaming will eventually lead to.

i had a feeling someone was going to say that

[cpt_azad]

Originally posted by MicroScreen2@27 July 2004 - 12:05
kind of the opposite here

i thought the mutants in farcry made the game tacky.

i'd have an FPS with huge levels you NEED vehicles to get round. it would be set in a bombed out city, hmmm after a nucleur attack maybe .

the plot and combat would be, you and a few others survived and you gotta carry on surviving past new enemy lines of your invaded city. you would need to use cover and conserve ammo to survive. the main objectives would be to take and hold the hospital till you all used the miracle radation cure. then there would be loads of unscripted less obvious missions like breaking into armories and making youre own weapons and traps. the games finished when you get rid of the bad guys, the russians! yeah the russians! it can be like an alternate history. the it still issnt all over because each time you start a new game you aree placed in a random district, meaning multiplayer means seperate singleplayer campains can merge and seperate depending on whether you want to save your bandwidth.
this would be cool cos if theres someting you want to do thats just to hard you can inite a freind to help cos bots just arent enough . you could also have clan fights if two districts decide not to share the hospital/armory/train station or any other important building :music1:

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.?

[MicroScreen2]

Originally posted by cpt_azad+28 July 2004 - 01:12--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (cpt_azad @ 28 July 2004 - 01:12)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-MicroScreen2@27 July 2004 - 12:05
kind of the opposite here

i thought the mutants in farcry made the game tacky.

i&#39;d have an FPS with huge levels you NEED vehicles to get round. it would be set in a bombed out city, hmmm after a nucleur attack maybe .

the plot and combat would be, you and a few others survived and you gotta carry on surviving past new enemy lines of your invaded city. you would need to use cover and conserve ammo to survive. the main objectives would be to take and hold the hospital till you all used the miracle radation cure. then there would be loads of unscripted less obvious missions like breaking into armories and making youre own weapons and traps. the games finished when you get rid of the bad guys, the russians&#33; yeah the russians&#33; it can be like an alternate history. the it still&nbsp; issnt all over because each time you start a new game you aree placed in a random district, meaning multiplayer means seperate singleplayer campains can merge and seperate depending on whether you want to save your bandwidth.
this would be cool cos if theres someting you want to do thats just to hard you can inite a freind to help cos bots just arent enough . you could also have clan fights if two districts decide not to share the hospital/armory/train station or any other important building :music1:

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.? [/b][/quote]
yeah, kind of. maybe a little more tactical though, cos it would be about holding land rather than finding artifacts and leaving

[cpt_azad]

Originally posted by MicroScreen2+28 July 2004 - 01:17--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MicroScreen2 @ 28 July 2004 - 01:17)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by cpt_azad@28 July 2004 - 01:12
<!--QuoteBegin-MicroScreen2

@27 July 2004 - 12:05
kind of the opposite here

i thought the mutants in farcry made the game tacky.

i&#39;d have an FPS with huge levels you NEED vehicles to get round. it would be set in a bombed out city, hmmm after a nucleur attack maybe .

the plot and combat would be, you and a few others survived and you gotta carry on surviving past new enemy lines of your invaded city. you would need to use cover and conserve ammo to survive. the main objectives would be to take and hold the hospital till you all used the miracle radation cure. then there would be loads of unscripted less obvious missions like breaking into armories and making youre own weapons and traps. the games finished when you get rid of the bad guys, the russians&#33; yeah the russians&#33; it can be like an alternate history. the it still issnt all over because each time you start a new game you aree placed in a random district, meaning multiplayer means seperate singleplayer campains can merge and seperate depending on whether you want to save your bandwidth.
this would be cool cos if theres someting you want to do thats just to hard you can inite a freind to help cos bots just arent enough . you could also have clan fights if two districts decide not to share the hospital/armory/train station or any other important building :music1:

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.?

yeah, kind of. maybe a little more tactical though, cos it would be about holding land rather than finding artifacts and leaving [/b][/quote]
true, maybe someone will make a mod for that game (STALKER). but ya, ur ideas are pretty unique, thinking of making a mod or something? that&#39;d be pretty cool tho defending "sectors" from other clans, very unique. i like it a lot

[MicroScreen2]

i keep trying to make one in farcry but the editor crashes everytime i change a texture

[cpt_azad]

Originally posted by MicroScreen2@28 July 2004 - 01:20
i keep trying to make one in farcry but the editor crashes everytime i change a texture

ur not the only one , i kinda gave up on farcry (no SP replay value, and lets face it MP sucks balls), but if u ever get it working lemme know, i&#39;ll play it

[Celerystalksme]

all i need in my game is Boobies, Holden Cars & Weapons Of Mass Destruction....

i should really make it

[MicroScreen2]

an fps with rts scale battles