Hahaha - Why don't more people think that logically? [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Alex H+29 July 2004 - 22:50--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Alex H @ 29 July 2004 - 22:50)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> j2k4 - Crap. Bush could do many things right (never running for office in the first place would have been a good start, but we'll leave that as a cynical and jaded comment from an Australian who has nothing to do with US domestic politics anyway).
What if Bush said, "This administration is going to provide free health care of a world class standard to every person in this country, citizen or not".
And then actually did it.
Why not have actual goals to achieve, instead of blanket statements like "The United States is now more secure." ?
An interesting idea would be "failure criteria" - every policy has criteria, such as if it costs more than X, or doesn't achieve X% reduction in (something bad) or doesn't achieve X% increase in (something good), or fails to meet preset performance standards, and make a named person, politician or official, responsible.
Many people will say, "But if they don't do a good job, we'll just vote for someone else". Does any one have true confidence in this approach that we currently use, or would the addition of failure criteria help bring some accountablity to western democracies?
<!--QuoteBegin-SuperJude™
"Hey if you are against the oil industry don't drive an S.U.V."
That article was cynical pull anything out of the air crap.
As as Bush doing a good job. I give him an D.
....unless you are rich, then it's a B.
You see, if you are rich then you got a nice tax breakthat you then passed along in the form of new job creationthen it's a BWe also must give kudos for the rather mandatory security measures put in due to the worst attack on our mainland.I give him an D
I think last month terrorists were planning to attack. I was given a LAVENDER warning and I then took precautions.
This seems like an extension of WMD "imminent threat".
We seriously can't fault the Prez for not finding Bin Laden.
Hell, he couldn't find WMD and there was a camera from space taking pictures of 'em.......apparently.
As far as admitting that he fucked in Iraq, well it would do him well with someone looking to vote for him but can't get past the 900+ that are dead.
We all already know he fucked up. Best ta say it., or GTFO!!!!
....of our faces claiming we committed our armed services to "get rid of a dictator".
Bookmarks