Study Shows The Bush Plan Is Good

[vidcc]

[clocker]

Originally posted by hobbes@18 August 2004 - 20:04


Designed by Clocker to countdown my prision sentence.  I took care of a "situation" for him, and now for the next 30 years, I get to appreciate his artistry.

See ya in 2029, hobbsie!

[bigboab]

Originally posted by clocker+19 August 2004 - 04:06--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 19 August 2004 - 04:06)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-hobbes@18 August 2004 - 20:04


Designed by Clocker to countdown my prision sentence. I took care of a "situation" for him, and now for the next 30 years, I get to appreciate his artistry.

See ya in 2029, hobbsie&#33; [/b][/quote]
I am saddened. I did not think you had a cruel streak, Clocker. What did Hobbes do to deserve this FlashGordonesque torture inflicted?

[hobbes]

Originally posted by bigboab+19 August 2004 - 05:40--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigboab &#064; 19 August 2004 - 05:40)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by clocker@19 August 2004 - 04:06
<!--QuoteBegin-hobbes

@18 August 2004 - 20:04


Designed by Clocker to countdown my prision sentence. I took care of a "situation" for him, and now for the next 30 years, I get to appreciate his artistry.

See ya in 2029, hobbsie&#33;

I am saddened. I did not think you had a cruel streak, Clocker. What did Hobbes do to deserve this FlashGordonesque torture inflicted?[/b][/quote]
Boab,

Perhaps you remember Clockers old signature?

"A friend will help you move, a good friend will help you move a body".

Anyway guess who got holding the proverbial (body)bag.




But holy sprockets, Boy Wonder, hear me now and believe me later, the chap has talent.

[bigboab]

There is a cruel streak in the man. I have to seriously reconsider if I should return this young lady into his grasp.

[j2k4]

Put the other ones up, vid?

They&#39;re in your in-box.

NEVERMIND-didn&#39;t see that you already had.

Well done, and thanks.

[J'Pol]

I bought a watch the last time I was in Manchester, a few weeks ago.

It synchronizes with atomic clocks which send out a signal of the (accurate) time, pretty much anywhere in the UK. The watch displays if it has such a signal and how strong it is.

It is more accurate than I would ever need, I bought it from Maplins and it cost £24.99.

Anything other than this is a curiosity. It is difficult to make, attractive, esoteric, but ultimately impractical. So why waste valuable resources when technology can achieve so much more, at a fraction of the cost.

[j2k4]

Originally posted by J&#39;Pol@19 August 2004 - 18:36
I bought a watch the last time I was in Manchester, a few weeks ago.

It synchronizes with atomic clocks which send out a signal of the (accurate) time, pretty much anywhere in the UK. The watch displays if it has such a signal and how strong it is.

It is more accurate than I would ever need, I bought it from Maplins and it cost £24.99.

Anything other than this is a curiosity. It is difficult to make, attractive, esoteric, but ultimately impractical. So why waste valuable resources when technology can achieve so much more, at a fraction of the cost.

Wet blanket.

I&#39;m listening to Leo Kottke, so there&#33;

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by j2k4+20 August 2004 - 00:42--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (j2k4 @ 20 August 2004 - 00:42)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol@19 August 2004 - 18:36
I bought a watch the last time I was in Manchester, a few weeks ago.

It synchronizes with atomic clocks which send out a signal of the (accurate) time, pretty much anywhere in the UK. The watch displays if it has such a signal and how strong it is.

It is more accurate than I would ever need, I bought it from Maplins and it cost £24.99.

Anything other than this is a curiosity. It is difficult to make, attractive, esoteric, but ultimately impractical. So why waste valuable resources when technology can achieve so much more, at a fraction of the cost.

Wet blanket.

I&#39;m listening to Leo Kottke, so there&#33; [/b][/quote]
I knew you were going to say that.

[j2k4]

Originally posted by J&#39;Pol+19 August 2004 - 18:47--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J&#39;Pol @ 19 August 2004 - 18:47)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by j2k4@20 August 2004 - 00:42
<!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol

@19 August 2004 - 18:36
I bought a watch the last time I was in Manchester, a few weeks ago.

It synchronizes with atomic clocks which send out a signal of the (accurate) time, pretty much anywhere in the UK. The watch displays if it has such a signal and how strong it is.

It is more accurate than I would ever need, I bought it from Maplins and it cost £24.99.

Anything other than this is a curiosity. It is difficult to make, attractive, esoteric, but ultimately impractical. So why waste valuable resources when technology can achieve so much more, at a fraction of the cost.

Wet blanket.

I&#39;m listening to Leo Kottke, so there&#33;

I knew you were going to say that. [/b][/quote]
That&#39;s due, no doubt, to your atomic timing capability.