My points are perfectly consistent logically and quite clear. Your reply is honestly incomprehensible to me. How did I abandon anything? Quite the contrary, I graciously explained to you how to generalize a concept. I guess this is difficult for you. Each post is a truncated version of our full meaning, just to save time.Originally Posted by JPaul
The bottom line is that you took umbrage at my attack on religion and since you had no rebuttal for my comment that wars based on religion are pointless, you chose to speciously distort the meaning of a "point" in the second part of the post.
Quite transparent really. I mean come on man, my post was there for 4 days and you didn't touch. The only reason you attempted to chop at it was because BM revived the thread and supported my position. I mean 4 days, you can do better than that.
And again, how are we so different, didn't see your clarification on this point. Makes that statement sound like sheer dramatics.
Bookmarks