Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: the fashion police will get you

  1. #11
    TheDave's Avatar n00b
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    yorkshire, england
    Age
    38
    Posts
    6,726
    wtf. how is it indecent? a little silly at worst but thats it

  2. Lounge   -   #12
    BawA's Avatar FST Pioneer BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Some Where but not here
    Age
    41
    Posts
    4,213
    i dont know whats so special about people showing thier underwear unless they want to make other's horny
    i personaly like this kinda of restriction, in some states where i live(Not US) walking with half's r restricted at all.
    if u take iran for example they paint shoulders if they see u with T-shirts
    Last edited by bawa@Klite_user; 02-10-2005 at 06:41 PM.


    "You can be mad as a mad dog at the way things went; you can swear and curse the fates, but when it comes to the end, you have to let go"
    Benjamen button

  3. Lounge   -   #13
    vidcc's Avatar there is no god
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,606
    Quote Originally Posted by Damn's_bbygirl
    I dont mind so much about the boxers, but the women who wear their thongs up around their waist and their pants down by their hips. Its just down-right slutty if you ask me!
    nothing wrong with thongs.....although not all women should be allowed to wear them

    Last edited by vidcc; 02-10-2005 at 06:42 PM.

    it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.

  4. Lounge   -   #14
    vidcc's Avatar there is no god
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,606
    I say if people can wear a crucifix as a symbol of christ then this fashion should be allowed to show support for those that suffered wedges at school
    Last edited by vidcc; 02-10-2005 at 06:44 PM.

    it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.

  5. Lounge   -   #15
    100%'s Avatar ╚════╩═╬════╝
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    13,383


    Question: if they\re obviously showing it - then is it impolite to stare at it?

  6. Lounge   -   #16
    manker's Avatar effendi
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    I wear an Even Steven wit
    Posts
    32,394
    Quote Originally Posted by 15%


    Question: if they\re obviously showing it - then is it impolite to stare at it?
    You'll be staring at their arse, so she wouldn't notice, therefore I reckon it would be impolite not to gawp.

    If we can bring tits into the equation then bear this smiley in mind
    I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -

    --Good for them if they survive.

  7. Lounge   -   #17
    Damn's_bbygirl's Avatar Damn's babygirl
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Corn-fed, Home-grown girl-next-door kinda geek
    Age
    38
    Posts
    75
    I just think that modesty is a rare commodoty these days. I wouldnt show my underwear to anyone who didnt earn it...

    underwear is supposed to be UNDER your clothes, hence underwear

    Do I sense a slight double standard?

  8. Lounge   -   #18
    manker's Avatar effendi
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    I wear an Even Steven wit
    Posts
    32,394
    Quote Originally Posted by Damn's_bbygirl
    I just think that modesty is a rare commodoty these days. I wouldnt show my underwear to anyone who didnt earn it...
    Can this precious commodity of underwear visibilty be earnt thro' the gift of prose

    I'm thinking yes.


    Welcome to teh forum, btw
    Last edited by manker; 02-10-2005 at 07:44 PM.
    I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -

    --Good for them if they survive.

  9. Lounge   -   #19
    100%'s Avatar ╚════╩═╬════╝
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    13,383
    Quote Originally Posted by Damn's_bbygirl
    underwear is supposed to be UNDER your clothes, hence underwear
    um....
    Socks - are supposed to be punched in the face?
    lingerie - should linger all over the place
    Jumper-are to be worn when humping
    Jackets - for when you jack up cars etc
    Condomn - for when your conning someone

  10. Lounge   -   #20
    enoughfakefiles's Avatar Ad ministrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    I'm an Even Steven with a
    Posts
    7,568
    Quote Originally Posted by Damn's_bbygirl
    I just think that modesty is a rare commodoty these days. I wouldnt show my underwear to anyone who didnt earn it...

    underwear is supposed to be UNDER your clothes, hence underwear

    Do I sense a slight double standard?
    Unless your from krypton.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •