Homeless people should not be able to have dogs.

[Busyman]

No, most homeless people do exactly that.

It is completely logical.

Phase 1: cuteness
Phase 2: money from fights (you did note that is was a fighting dog, right)



How is this not so completely obvious,

it is not like we are talking about a mutt.

You think that this man will have thios dog 5 years from now, are you that clueless?

You are a victim of missing the meaning to his words, as I clearly pointed out.

You read again.

Canuk even mentioned that he knows homeless folk need a friend but they will not be able to properly care the dog.

You mentioning the possiblity of exploitation is another matter. That blanket statement does not apply to all homeless people. I've seen the few homeless folk with pets end up selling it after a while.

[Busyman]

Also known as: letting the exception represent the norm.

Also known as: Your blanket statement is not correct.

[Rick Phlegm]

Also known as: letting the exception represent the norm.

Good point, it was just one guy right enough. But like I say, I'm sure they value the companionship more than any other way they could exploit the dog.

[hobbes]

Good point, it was just one guy right enough. But like I say, I'm sure they value the companionship more than any other way they could exploit the dog.

So you haven't read a word I've said.

Just another poorly informed. piece of shit post.

[Busyman]

So you haven't read a word I've said.

Just another poorly informed. piece of shit post.

You're right. He disagrees so he's wrong.

[hobbes]

Also known as: Your blanket statement is not correct.

if you read my posts, you can easily understand how I translate his crude emotion into a logical opinion.

Why do you need it to be so concrete.

You cannot understand what he is saying?

[hobbes]

You're right. He disagrees so he's wrong.

He is wrong because he has not read what I am saying.

That is not so hard.

[Busyman]

if you read my posts, you can easily understand how I translate his crude emotion into a logical opinoion.

Why do you need it to be so concrete.

You cannot understand what he is saying?

Oh no I get why you say what you say.

It had $5 in the post and the dog was a mastif.

As I say, read Canuk's post again. I doubt all the homeless folks had pets yet he gave money.

The exploitation was mentioned by you.

[Rick Phlegm]

if you read my posts, you can easily understand how I translate his crude emotion into a logical opinion.

Why do you need it to be so concrete.

You cannot understand what he is saying?

This is a discussion thread, not a private post directed at you. If you don't like what I say then stfu and keep it to yourself because I will not be flamed just because I dared to speak in between some private argument you're having with the rest of the world.

It's my opinion. Nothing more.

[Busyman]

He is wrong because he has not read what I am saying.

That is not so hard.

Good lord man, everyone got what you said.

They are exploiting the cuteness factor and using the dog for fights to gain money.

I DISAGREE WITH THAT ASCERTION AS A BLANKET STATEMENT. DUH!!!