Colin is right.
Many of us have discussed this back and forth, a lot, but you (Colin) summed it up well.
But (with regards to one of the points) I suppose you could argue that had people not had the chance of trying the product before they bought it, they'd not had known it was a piece of shite, and may therefore, to their eternal regret, have bought what they won't now. And thus p2p does, in a way, cost the industry something as they can't get away with selling inferior products as they can't, to the same extent, trick people into buying their products with misleading marketing tactics and similar.
Also, Skizo, the people who download lots and lots were even less likely to buy all of what they downloaded, since most of us have a finite amount of money to spend, and not all the time in the world to do it in, either, so I don't see how the amount of files downloaded should matter.
Nah, it's the people who sell the stuff who are screwing p2p, it's on their head.
Bookmarks