the other day i was thinking i have not used my A: Drive 4 2 years, when was the last time u used yours
do u think they will stop makeing PC with a: drives???
the other day i was thinking i have not used my A: Drive 4 2 years, when was the last time u used yours
do u think they will stop makeing PC with a: drives???
used mine just this morning to make a bios flash disk for a pc im fixing and updating will be a while yet before i dont use a floppy drive
i use floopies all the time, perfect for spreading trojans around the campus network, no trace, no nothin
maybe my finger prints but....who the hell gives a fuck? lol
There is already a current thread about this very subject.
Apparently, scanning beyond page one is as obsolete as floppy drives themselves.
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
ok
i used my A: drive about a week ago
[i used a zip disk most days this week, which is still a very big floppy disk]
i86 PCs kinda need floppy drives due to the highly variable hardware combinations that could be made.
and as cds aren't rewritable they can only act as a read only boot device, which is often not ideal.
on the other hand,
macs haven't shipped with floppy drives for half a decade or so now,
new macs all have burners as standard so the cd can completely replace floppies.
why didn't you tell me before i postedOriginally posted by clocker@15 November 2003 - 00:22
There is already a current thread about this very subject.
Apparently, scanning beyond page one is as obsolete as floppy drives themselves.
does that mean i should cross post to that thread too?
wanna pot a link from here to there too?
If you'd like to post in the other thread we could have two identical topics at the top of page one.
Very exciting.
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
did not use a since i bought my comp 3 yrs ago
love yourself
Wouldnt it be cool if floppies got replaced with a MD drive because i think they are magneteic disks and can be written and erased.cds aren't rewritable they can only act as a read only boot device, which is often not ideal.
Bookmarks