This is interesting. I never paid attention to the Drudge Report and didn't know he was partisan.
His report is clear spin.
The DNC blurb said nothing about "declaring voter intimidation---even when none exists".
I get the point of the DNC blurb though.
Translation:
Launch a preemptive strike to curb voter intimidation. (Duh. )
Futhermore, do this especially in places where voter intimidation has happened before.
This acknowledges that there was voter fraud before and to draw attention those areas to put it under a microscope.
If one bothers to actually read the DNC blurb instead of being spoon fed propaganda, the reports simply talks about
reviewing Republican tactics used in the past
expressing concern
quoting leadership denouncing tactics to discourage people from voting
not accepting advertising that have false claims on voting requirements
Ya gotta read this stuff folks.
I find nothing wrong with it. Plus The Drudge Report is clearly adding words that amount to lies.
Once again I think many see through this so called report.
I am not impressed again.
I understand when people try stuff like this it's just coy politicking but the folks that actually buy this shit is scary.
RIF
Last edited by Busyman; 10-14-2004 at 06:27 PM.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
I can't see any problem with it either..it's pointing ways to combat an area that previously had a problem.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
And?Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
Your point is?
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
The fact that you show anything from the Drudge report shows your bias. i do not only look to progressive news outlets for sources. I go to both sides, and then I continue to dig.
There was/is voter fraud in Nevada,Oregon, Florida, and who knows where else?
Originally Posted by ruthie
I can’t believe that you of all people have the audacity to call me biased. Every single thread that you start here and in the old WN&E is something that’s anti Bush.
This also comes from the person who started an entire thread about the big CBS new story about Bush’s National Guard service.
BigHank, theres a difference..Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
ruthie has never used pravda or Socialist Worker as a source....
Last edited by Rat Faced; 10-14-2004 at 07:15 PM.
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
silly Hank...believe it. I start threads about things I'm interested in...like the failures of Bush, Bush is a criminal, the war is illegal, and such.Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
Yup...I posted the story when I saw it...documents were fake, story isn't, in my opinion.
audacity? nah. LOL
Well maybe in your eyes a credible source is a document made at kinkos but not in mine.
No, you prefer Drudge. I don't mind acknowledging rather's fuck up..he did fuck up. Most people know Bush is a liar
Bookmarks