I think its not good to compare trackers if you have fsc then fsc is good else if have ftn, then it is good . there is no point in comparing them.
I think its not good to compare trackers if you have fsc then fsc is good else if have ftn, then it is good . there is no point in comparing them.
Comparison can only be made if you are a member in both the sites. Unless you are not a memeber you cannot compare. Though you might share the experience of one. But comparison can only happen if you are member.
I don't know much about FSC as I am not a member however, both sites may have there own advantage and they both are considered as underground trackers...
I am proud to be a part of this communities.
its funny how so many people without FTN always seem to vote for it..
FSC is a better tracker.
I hate comparisons
But FSC cant compete with FTN when it comes to content, speed and pre times
FSC on the other hand has good request section
Both of them have a great community
madness ? This .... is .... FSCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
you can't compare the two sites, it's illogic.
FTN is an elite 0day oriented tracker, high speed uploaders, tons of packs, etc
FSC is based on discipline among users, about a tight community with people you can call friends. Nearlly all aspects are thought in the sharing/comunity area. Tell me another site with 3k users which has 10GB + torrents alive after 1.5 years from uploading? Not only that ,but half the original snathcers are seeding it... Thats what FSC is about.
As i said ,the person which started this thread probably has no ideea about either of these 2 trackers , he just saw them in the wiaw thread at the same level and thought are iddentical
I like the idea of becoming part of a community like fsc
The Spirit of Something Greater
Bookmarks