So guys, you stay up past my bed time, but after reading Sara's quote, I thought she summed up my point quite nicely and so I turned in.Originally posted by sara5564@30 May 2003 - 03:39
Of course, the greatest problem with any amount of information, particularly since the Internet, is that we suffer from information overload....
What this essentially means, is that whilst there is a wealth of viewpoints, stances, and opinions 'out there', the difficulty is differentiating the true from the not so true.
So...as the US is one of the most wired in the world...access to this information is relatively easy for those wishing to look...the problem of course is sifting through the chaff....essentially, we have to make our own minds up, and even if we think we are well informed, it can only be as far as our research to date combined with a few preconceptions.
Americans, Europeans....all have access to it....its the interpretation that is the issue and the problem. There will allways be those willing to take the side they are most comfortable believing, and those who are looking for a radical take...majority opinion is not necessarily the right one any more than the minority.
Ahh well......perception is as always.....subjective....I think therefore I have an opinion!
Those who live in America, via the internet, have access to media from sources all over the globe and therefore it is just a matter of personal investigation. We are not over here in a box with a dem. speaker on the left and a reb speaker on the right, we have as many speakers as we chose.
Myfiles, I beg you to bear with me if I misunderstand you, I'm not a morning person. You seemed to be implying that our politcal homogeneity restricts the different perspectives our media sources will have on a subject. So instead of hearing about an event from the Rs and Ds, we would get several more points of view in your country.
It seems that 1 event with 5 different points of view and 5 different agendas, just leads you back to "filtering" additional data.
I would like to think news reflects reality and is not motivated by political or financial agendas, but alas.....
So back to the original poster, I have access to everything that he does via the internet, why does he think I am in the dark?
Bookmarks