What do think of the new levels?

**Night0wl** · 04-25-2007, 06:49 PM

Originally Posted by SnakesMan901

bad levels ,,,
oink was rated 3/5 and now 4/10
3/5*2 =6/10 , maybe it's 5/10 Not 4/10
and bitmetv should be more than lvl 5 ...

Everyone knows that in content Oink beats all those trackers, so if you want to judge a site by what other people say about it then be my guest

Or actually it depends if you like your music or not. If you hate music, then it's 0/10. I like music so for me it's a perfect 10

I can't see it, so I can't really tell you what other trackers are misplaced, but I saw a copy of the old one and wasn't impressed.

**bytetorrent** · 04-25-2007, 07:01 PM

nice move ..

..
so ftn is the new nadia comaneci 10/10 ! lol

IMHO it would have been better if those Level's were based on content ,speed and pretimes etc and the rarity rating inside the [#] tags !
for ex: Level 10 = ScT[9] !

**r4cc00n** · 04-25-2007, 08:25 PM

the levels and ratings of tracker invites and accounts are still pointless

**Sentient** · 04-26-2007, 04:13 AM

POS you took my idea and now won't even let me see it!

**mbucari1** · 04-26-2007, 04:18 AM

I actually don't care. I have what I want of the bittorrent trackers available (that I know of). I'm getting access to an 8TB dumpsite in a few days, so I probably won't be downloading via BT as much. I will be uploading however.