yes there is a need
no there is no need, but keep the present categories
there should be no hate crime laws at all
the laws should go further to include more categories
there is no god
No.Originally Posted by SHUVT
on a side note I would like to ask whoever said "no there is no need, but keep the present categories" why they think that the present categories merit special treatment but not those targeted specifically for their sexuality?
Last edited by vidcc; 05-08-2007 at 08:10 PM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
en(un)lightened
Perhaps I should have been more comprehensive in my answer:
Eliminate all hate-crimes legislation having to do with religion, race, sexuality or any of the other sundry and currently favored victimologies.
Wipe that shit off the books, and do it now.
Instead, make the particular brand of stupid-think that leads to such legislation a crime punishable by death.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
there is no god
You made that obvious and although I disagree at least you don't have exceptions.
And then by making derogatory remarks instead of debating, your views on the topic are marginalized.Instead, make the particular brand of stupid-think that leads to such legislation a crime punishable by death.
My question is to those that think certain categories such as religion merit the extra seriousness standard of the crime but not for other groups.
There has been a lot of misleading statements made about this bill and by far most objections I have seen have been about the bill doing things it does not do.
Last edited by j2k4; 05-08-2007 at 10:07 PM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
en(un)lightened
Any need for the exceptions you seek is met by the variety of penalties extant, i.e., those having to do with murder, which you have already pointed out.You made that obvious and although I disagree at least you don't have exceptions.
Instead, make the particular brand of stupid-think that leads to such legislation a crime punishable by death.
What the bill "does not do" (mostly) is make sense, and, unless you yourself are a Senator charged with the making of laws, you should not feel derogated by my remarks.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Simplify
Somebody else sounds just like me in here!!
Your brain is wonderful SHUVT!!
Last edited by MaxOverlord; 05-09-2007 at 06:27 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks