View Poll Results: Did the officer's do the right thing

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    17 50.00%
  • No

    12 35.29%
  • Other - I will give you more details below

    1 2.94%
  • Ouch

    4 11.76%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: Did the police do the right thing?

  1. #11

  2. Lounge   -   #12
    muchspl3's Avatar muchspl3 > muchspl2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Location Location
    Posts
    1,676
    yes, maybe next time she drives with a suspended license, she'll get off the phone with mark and get out of the car when the officer asks her repeatedly to do so.
    dumb bitch
    Last edited by muchspl3; 06-02-2005 at 09:25 PM.

  3. Lounge   -   #13
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,763
    Speeding, broken windsheild, burnt brake light and it appears that her licence was already suspended when the officer attempted to arrest her. Then she refuses to get out, talking on the cellphone and tries to hit the other officer when he takes her phone away.

    So yes they did the right thing.

    People forget that driving on public roads is a privilege and not a right.

  4. Lounge   -   #14
    Filliz's Avatar ______________
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,468
    What stopped them from just forcing her out of the car by hand?
    Two cops vs. a woman

    Ok,she had some attitude and wasn't really cooparative...but tazing her with 50.000 volts?Twice?!

    Something's really fucked up with the U.S police forces if you ask me.

    hmm...asspie

  5. Lounge   -   #15
    DanB's Avatar Smoke weed everyday
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    London, so fuck y'all
    Age
    45
    Posts
    20,595
    I guess if you are used to a brutal police force you take it as the norm

  6. Lounge   -   #16
    DarthInsinuate's Avatar Died in battle
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Arkham Asylum
    Posts
    4,872
    Quote Originally Posted by Filliz
    What stopped them from just forcing her out of the car by hand?
    Two cops vs. a woman

    Ok,she had some attitude and wasn't really cooparative...but tazing her with 50.000 volts?Twice?!

    Something's really fucked up with the U.S police forces if you ask me.
    they explained that dragging her out would more likely end either one of them up with an injury. Laying your hands on someone is violent, electricuting them isn't.

    The second shock was to get her to put her hands behind her back, any suspect is considered a threat until they do this.

    i'm not sure what the significance of 50,000 volts is, perhaps it would have been better to tase her with a 12v battery, i'm not sure, would that subdue someone?
    The Sexay Half Of ABBA And Max: Freelance Plants

  7. Lounge   -   #17
    muchspl3's Avatar muchspl3 > muchspl2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Location Location
    Posts
    1,676
    Quote Originally Posted by Filliz
    What stopped them from just forcing her out of the car by hand?
    Two cops vs. a woman

    Ok,she had some attitude and wasn't really cooparative...but tazing her with 50.000 volts?Twice?!

    Something's really fucked up with the U.S police forces if you ask me.
    "hmmm...should i wrestle with this ignorant bitch and risk her jamming her fake 5" finger nail in my eye or just shock her to get her ass outta the damned car."

  8. Lounge   -   #18
    Filliz's Avatar ______________
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,468
    they explained that dragging her out would more likely end either one of them up with an injury.
    They're cops for crying out loud
    There's is a chance you can end up with a scratch or a bruise from time to time.

    Laying your hands on someone is violent, electricuting them isn't.
    In my eyes it's only considered violent/assault if there was no need to get physical with the suspect.
    But that's probably not how it works over there.

    The second shock was to get her to put her hands behind her back, any suspect is considered a threat until they do this.
    That's probably how it's stated in their theory books.
    So yes,in theory she's still a threat.
    But seeing she was already down on the ground because of the first taze,I don't see how she could've been a threat to those two officers.

    i'm not sure what the significance of 50,000 volts is, perhaps it would have been better to tase her with a 12v battery, i'm not sure, would that subdue someone?
    Over here we only use tazers on cattle,not people.
    Crazy,huh?

    Anyway,if the person behind the wheel of that car looked something like this:


    then yea,I can understand you are tempted to use a tazer.
    But this is just ridiculous.


    "hmmm...should i wrestle with this ignorant bitch and risk her jamming her fake 5" finger nail in my eye or just shock her to get her ass outta the damned car."
    Why not taze everyone they pull over,just to eliminate the risk of them getting violent or obstructive.

    hmm...asspie

  9. Lounge   -   #19
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,763
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthInsinuate
    i'm not sure what the significance of 50,000 volts is, perhaps it would have been better to tase her with a 12v battery, i'm not sure, would that subdue someone?
    The 12v battery wouldn't work. You wouldn't even feel it. The tazer is high voltage but low amperage.

  10. Lounge   -   #20
    Smith's Avatar Since 1989.. BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    in a plane, high as fuck
    Posts
    5,538
    Quote Originally Posted by GepperRankins
    all women driving SUVs should get tazered.
    LMAO

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •