geezz
Yes
No
Other - I will give you more details below
Ouch
yes, maybe next time she drives with a suspended license, she'll get off the phone with mark and get out of the car when the officer asks her repeatedly to do so.
dumb bitch
Last edited by muchspl3; 06-02-2005 at 09:25 PM.
Speeding, broken windsheild, burnt brake light and it appears that her licence was already suspended when the officer attempted to arrest her. Then she refuses to get out, talking on the cellphone and tries to hit the other officer when he takes her phone away.
So yes they did the right thing.
People forget that driving on public roads is a privilege and not a right.
What stopped them from just forcing her out of the car by hand?
Two cops vs. a woman
Ok,she had some attitude and wasn't really cooparative...but tazing her with 50.000 volts?Twice?!
Something's really fucked up with the U.S police forces if you ask me.
hmm...asspie
I guess if you are used to a brutal police force you take it as the norm
they explained that dragging her out would more likely end either one of them up with an injury. Laying your hands on someone is violent, electricuting them isn't.Originally Posted by Filliz
The second shock was to get her to put her hands behind her back, any suspect is considered a threat until they do this.
i'm not sure what the significance of 50,000 volts is, perhaps it would have been better to tase her with a 12v battery, i'm not sure, would that subdue someone?
The Sexay Half Of ABBA And Max: Freelance Plants
"hmmm...should i wrestle with this ignorant bitch and risk her jamming her fake 5" finger nail in my eye or just shock her to get her ass outta the damned car."Originally Posted by Filliz
They're cops for crying out loudthey explained that dragging her out would more likely end either one of them up with an injury.
There's is a chance you can end up with a scratch or a bruise from time to time.
In my eyes it's only considered violent/assault if there was no need to get physical with the suspect.Laying your hands on someone is violent, electricuting them isn't.
But that's probably not how it works over there.
That's probably how it's stated in their theory books.The second shock was to get her to put her hands behind her back, any suspect is considered a threat until they do this.
So yes,in theory she's still a threat.
But seeing she was already down on the ground because of the first taze,I don't see how she could've been a threat to those two officers.
Over here we only use tazers on cattle,not people.i'm not sure what the significance of 50,000 volts is, perhaps it would have been better to tase her with a 12v battery, i'm not sure, would that subdue someone?
Crazy,huh?
Anyway,if the person behind the wheel of that car looked something like this:
then yea,I can understand you are tempted to use a tazer.
But this is just ridiculous.
Why not taze everyone they pull over,just to eliminate the risk of them getting violent or obstructive."hmmm...should i wrestle with this ignorant bitch and risk her jamming her fake 5" finger nail in my eye or just shock her to get her ass outta the damned car."
hmm...asspie
The 12v battery wouldn't work. You wouldn't even feel it. The tazer is high voltage but low amperage.Originally Posted by DarthInsinuate
LMAOOriginally Posted by GepperRankins
Bookmarks