Child Porn Crime Rises In Britain: Report

[Biggles]

It is indeed.

Although it does rather strike me that if the police have not followed up most of the leads by now the chances are that the relevant computers are at the bottom of a land fill - in fact most computers from 1999 are at the bottom of a land fill regardless of content.

Also, if they arrest 7000 people, where are they going to put them - it would seem lunacy to put them all in the same place or even in aggregate lumps of say 200? This whole issue is going to cause some administration serious problems at some point in the future; either that or they get a couple of steps ahead of the criminals and block the source.

[Rat Faced]

Originally posted by Biggles@13 January 2004 - 21:27


Also, if they arrest 7000 people, where are they going to put them - it would seem lunacy to put them all in the same place or even in aggregate lumps of say 200? This whole issue is going to cause some administration serious problems at some point in the future; either that or they get a couple of steps ahead of the criminals and block the source.

I hate to say this but...

Put them in the main prison population and get the guards to go on a tea break...the problem will solve itself....

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by Rat Faced+13 January 2004 - 23:24--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Rat Faced @ 13 January 2004 - 23:24)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Biggles@13 January 2004 - 21:27


Also, if they arrest 7000 people, where are they going to put them - it would seem lunacy to put them all in the same place or even in aggregate lumps of say 200? This whole issue is going to cause some administration serious problems at some point in the future; either that or they get a couple of steps ahead of the criminals and block the source.

I hate to say this but...

Put them in the main prison population and get the guards to go on a tea break...the problem will solve itself.... [/b][/quote]
Well thought out, constructive and helpful argument there, thanks for that.

Will you lead the vigilantes or had you some else in mind.

[Wizard_Mon1]

Originally posted by J&#39;Pol+13 January 2004 - 22:27--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J&#39;Pol @ 13 January 2004 - 22:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by Rat Faced@13 January 2004 - 23:24
<!--QuoteBegin-Biggles

@13 January 2004 - 21:27


Also, if they arrest 7000 people, where are they going to put them - it would seem lunacy to put them all in the same place or even in aggregate lumps of say 200? This whole issue is going to cause some administration serious problems at some point in the future; either that or they get a couple of steps ahead of the criminals and block the source.

I hate to say this but...

Put them in the main prison population and get the guards to go on a tea break...the problem will solve itself....

Well thought out, constructive and helpful argument there, thanks for that.

Will you lead the vigilantes or had you some else in mind. [/b][/quote]
in the context of my original post i mentioned a guy who has a family. im not excusing his behavior one little bit but he is still only human and maybe he just needs help.

if he cant be help then let teh dogs lose on him as well as prisoners.

[Biggles]

Rat Face

Care in the community?

That essentially was the problem I was suggesting. 7000 could fill half a dozen prisons on their own. Put a couple of hundred in one prison and they would be running the show. I am not sure of the total prison population of the Uk but I think all told, taking into account remand and open prisons, it is about 60,000. I have to confess I am a bit hooked on the environment thread at the moment and am reading some stuff on that. If anybody has the figures to hand throw them in.

It must be remembered that this was one sting 3 or 4 years ago and that the news report I saw (which of course may have been scare mongering) suggested that these 7000 are only a fraction of the actual problem - I may be wrong but I am sure it said the police estimates were in the region of 200,000. (I wouldn&#39;t hang my hat on that though as it was some time ago I didn&#39;t pay much attention).

[Rat Faced]

Originally posted by J&#39;Pol+13 January 2004 - 22:27--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J&#39;Pol @ 13 January 2004 - 22:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by Rat Faced@13 January 2004 - 23:24
<!--QuoteBegin-Biggles

@13 January 2004 - 21:27


Also, if they arrest 7000 people, where are they going to put them - it would seem lunacy to put them all in the same place or even in aggregate lumps of say 200? This whole issue is going to cause some administration serious problems at some point in the future; either that or they get a couple of steps ahead of the criminals and block the source.

I hate to say this but...

Put them in the main prison population and get the guards to go on a tea break...the problem will solve itself....

Well thought out, constructive and helpful argument there, thanks for that.

Will you lead the vigilantes or had you some else in mind. [/b][/quote]
I have no intend to being involved.

I did mention that i hated to admit the problem could sort itself out....personally im of a much more liberal viewpoint on this subject; the people involved should be tied down and the families of the victims let loose with rusty blunt knives.

Unfortunatly Mr Blunket doesnt listen to me

[J'Pol]

I think we were actually discussing the material and specifically how the internet had made it more accessible.

Perhaps I had picked up the direction of the thread incorrectly. It was more related to pedophile pornography as opposed to pedophile acts carried out on children.

I take it your sentencing policy remains the same, brutal beatings for those convicted of having such material. Do you still decline to do this yourself.

[Rat Faced]

J&#39;Pol, you&#39;ve caught me out...

I really shouldnt post when im tired...

My punishments were for the purpetrators of course...


The punishment should fit the crime they say...so for watching this?

Let em sit through 5 years of enforced Richard and Judy

[Biggles]

:&#39;(

That is harsh, very very harsh.....


but fair some would say.

[J'Pol]

Should we become animals, in order to deal with animals.

Some say yes, I don&#39;t know.