Wich produces better quality?
Wich produces better quality?
xvid
Smith is a bag of douche,FACT.
No competition, it's XviD. (lol xvid spelled backwards is divx )
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
Yes, the name XviD is DivX read backwards, but basically it's just a cool name ;-) Nonetheless the reversed name may also reflect the will to mark the ethical differences between DivX and XviD:Originally Posted by cpt_azad
DivX is proprietary software, with an opaque development cycle that follows only a commercial logic. XviD is Free Software (licensed under the GNU GPL), open to third-party contributions and aims for standard's compliance, portability and interoperability, high processing speed and superior quality.
Do we just have to burn our xvid's as normal data file onto cd-r for a standalone dvd player (that can read xvid ofcourse) to be able to read?
Originally Posted by kaydeecaine
yes that works for me
Open your mind
What's the best software to make Xvids & DivX?
I'm thinking of using Gordian Knot...
it's okay (gordian knot)
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
Bookmarks