What invites are worth (Improvements and suggestions Thread)

[Buggyme]

I think that this bracket rating system will work great!

[j0ker]

it's not anymore 3333's idea... j0ker's

glad you liked it.

[nadeem111as]

ya add more trackers
and please tell us what is the mechanism that you use to rate the trackers
???

[Patriot foreve]

The new Beta Version of The rankings is done and it will be posted here later today or tomorrow after making some slight changes

The new Trackers that u will like to add will be choosed and added depending on Your choices and there will be more detailed information about that in anew thread but just after we finish the current improvement and let all members give their opinions about it

[Patriot foreve]

and please tell us what is the mechanism that you use to rate the trackers
???

The new ranking will combine the current rarity rank and besides each tracker there will be its overall raking depending on content,speed,pre-times and rarity also special trackers which have certain releases like oink,BMTV,KG and others will be identified easily

also the 0-day trackers which may have exclusive releases which man't be found on other trackers will also be identified easily

and as i have said before the new beta thread will be posted here later today or tomorrow for all of u to make your comments and suggestions

thx

[j0ker]

btw, when i said more info about the trackers, and that the review are not helping.. it was more like...

if the reviewers could add their opinion... what's the SLR on 0day torrents few minutes after they're uploaded, how many seeders/leechers on a regular torrent.

cuz some sites have many active peers, but other trackers only few.

[Patriot foreve]

hi

i am going to post the improvemnts applied to the what invites are worth here to see what do u think of it before applying it

as far as u can see,i have implented an overall ranking besides the rarity ranking that is currentky used ,the new overall ranking will be either

() for 0-day trackers

() for dedicated trackers like oink for music,bitmetv,TT ,etc

()* for 0-day Trackers which have content which mayn't exist in alot of other trackers

The Current Ranking now between () after the edits is for the following

content+Speed+Pre-times

while the rarity ranking is our main levels ranking

i would like u to comment on the current overall rankings sothat if anything needs to be edited

What Invites Are Worth

Maintained by: Buggyme and Patriot foreve

This Scale Is To Rate Sites From 1 To 5

• 1 being the easiest to get an invite or account and 5 the hardest.
• This has nothing to do with the contents of the trackers.

To Contribute To This Post

• Post site name and number according to value you think site has.
• Choices are not definitive so anyone could drop an opinion.
• Make suggestions what trackers should be added.
• Not all trakers will be in this list.

Tracker Reviews NEW!

• Trackers listed in BOLD have reviews, just simply click on it to see the review.
• Reviews are for FST members only! Please DO NOT copy it or use it on another site.

THIS LIST SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TOO LITERALLY.
It's just to figure where each site stands (rarity-wise)
Do NOT ask the URL of the sites specified in this thread.


Level 1 •••••
These sites are open for sign ups. Any users looking to join any of those sites can simply go to the site and register.

Bitsoup(3.5), ILoveTorrents(3), docs.torrents.ro(3.5), Midnight Torrents(3) and countless others...


Level 2 •••••
Accounts at these sites are very easy to obtain. If you ask for an invite/account here in this board, chances are you will get one for free.

TL(4.5), FL(3), TauriTracker(3), Demonoid(4)*, ChronicTracker(3), TD(3), ST(3.5), Bitspyder(3.5), Learnbits(3.5), SCC(3.5), HorrorChannel(3.5), TVJunkies(3), UKNova(3.5), Elbitz(3.5), SITR(2.5), BitHDTV(3.5), PussyTorrents(4), DH(3), HT(2.5), Quorks(2), XboxSky(4), etc.

2.5: A-L(2.5), VIPMusic(3), Music-Vids(3), TTi(3.5), CO(3), ThePlace(3.5), TheVault(3.5), ExtremeBits(3), TB(3.5), PotUK(3), BTMusic(3), TVTorrents(4), TvT.ro(3), FinDVDR(2.5), RevTT(4),Sweloaders(3), SoftTorrents(3), ProAudioTorrents(3.5) etc.


Level 3 •••••
Accounts at these sites are harder to obtain due to various reasons. However, it is still fairly easy to get provided that you offer a site with the same value in return.

rSR(3), CZone(3.5), iPLAY(4), BitMe(4.5), BitMeTV(5), OiNK(4), Pisexy(3)*, TS-Tracker(3), x264(3), FileFight(3), HDBits(3)*, FileZone(3), KrayTracker(3), etc.

3.5: TT(3.5), PT(4), KG(3.5), Swebits(3.5), TorrentBits(3.5), RMVBusters(3.5) etc.


Level 4 •••••
Accounts at these sites are quite difficult to obtain. It may take you a while to get into these sites.

SweDVDR(4), FSC(3.5)*, WB(3.5), E***o(4), Revolt(1), NB(4), IT(3.5), Thor's Land(3)*, etc.

4.5: FTN(5)*, FB(4)*, RP(4)*, FTWR(3)*, etc.


Level 5 •••••
Getting an account at these sites are very difficult if not impossible. Consider yourselves lucky if you have an account at these trackers.

ScT(5)* and UK-T(3).

[crossfade]

If this ranking is solely based on rarity, only U*** should be on 5 and FTN and SCT should be at the same level - so both 5 or both 4.5.
If content plays somewhat a role, FTN and SCT should be both on 5 and U*** should be on 4.5 or 4.
BitMeTV and Oink should be 3.5, perhaps Bitme as well.
From rarity point of view, I see no difference between levels 2 and 2.5 - they can all be obtained very easily. It is true some have better content and maybe that's why they're rated 2.5 but I'm not sure content plays a role here.

[gino77]

i Think We Must Find Any Way To Solve Spies Problem

[Invites_4_You]

If this ranking is solely based on rarity, only U*** should be on 5 and FTN and SCT should be at the same level - so both 5 or both 4.5.
If content plays somewhat a role, FTN and SCT should be both on 5 and U*** should be on 4.5 or 4.
BitMeTV and Oink should be 3.5, perhaps Bitme as well.
From rarity point of view, I see no difference between levels 2 and 2.5 - they can all be obtained very easily. It is true some have better content and maybe that's why they're rated 2.5 but I'm not sure content plays a role here.

Please read what is bold.

[COLOR="Blue"]hi

i am going to post the improvemnts applied to the what invites are worth here to see what do u think of it before applying it

as far as u can see,i have implented an overall ranking besides the rarity ranking that is currentky used ,the new overall ranking will be either