• Section Navigation

  • Poll

    How much music do you have? (Votes: 255)

    1. < 5 GB (Votes: 18)

    2. 6-10 (Votes: 13)

    3. 11-20 (Votes: 22)

    4. 21-30 (Votes: 22)

    5. 31-100 (Votes: 48)

    6. 101-150 (Votes: 29)

    7. 151-250 (Votes: 19)

    8. 251-500 (Votes: 27)

    9. 501 GB -1TB (Votes: 27)

    10. 1TB - 3TB (Votes: 11)

    11. 3TB - 5TB (Votes: 6)

    12. > 5TB (Votes: 13)

  • A new record: 9,729 P2P porn pushers sued at once

    Move over, US Copyright Group—the pornographers are going to show you how they do it (in several senses). Over the last two weeks, one lawyer with an AOL e-mail address, working out of a Martinsburg, West Virginia office, has managed to file more than 16,700 new lawsuits against file-swappers with a taste for Batman and booty. The cases follow the familiar pattern and wouldn't be notable except for the fact that they make lawyer Kenneth J. Ford the current copyright litigation champion of the entire US in 2010.
    Ford's law practice has done well since he went into the porn protection biz earlier this year, setting up shop under the name Adult Copyright Company. He filed several lawsuits during the summer for films like Juicy White Anal Booty 4, but it's only this autumn that his business has really come into its own.
    On October 29, Ford helped Axel Braun Productions sue 7,098 anonymous online Does for sharing the filmBatman XXX: A Porn Parody. According to the legal complaint, the film features "adult actresses engaging in various intense sexual acts" and was distributed via BitTorrent by the 7,098 IP addresses in question.
    On November 4, Ford stepped up his game again, drafting a complaint on behalf of porn producer West Coast Productions against a whopping 9,729 people—the most we have ever seen in a single one of these P2P complaints. (The film in question, according to Slyck, is called Teen Anal Nightmare 2.)
    That's nearly 17,000 people in under two weeks. In contrast, it took the RIAA five years to go after 18,000 individuals.
    It's also more aggressive than US Copyright Group, which helped to develop the for-profit P2P litigation model in the US earlier this year but has only sued around 16,000 people so far.
    At a "content protection retreat" a few weeks ago, the pornography industry announced its plan to "significantly reduce digital piracy of adult content and to effectively drive those who engage in adult content piracy completely underground by January 2012." Although several studios take issue with Ford's approach, it's clear that plenty have no problem with it.
    Once it has the names behind these IP addresses, Adult Copyright Company will send out settlement letters. The accused will be able to settle online, using a credit card, and they had better do so quick. As Ford warns, in all caps, "THE MORE EFFORT WE EXPEND, INCLUDING NAMING YOU INDIVIDUALLY IN A LAWSUIT, THE MORE WE MUST RECOVER TO MAKE OUR CLIENT WHOLE."
    If a case does proceed to trial, Ford says that he has "THE RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES TO FILE CLAIMS AGAINST INFRINGERS, SEEKING THE MAXIMUM STATUTORY DAMAGES AVAILABLE UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAW." For willful infringers, that's $150,000 per infringement. Holy damage award, Batman!


    Source: Ars Technica
    Comments 4 Comments
    1. duke0102's Avatar
      duke0102 -
      FFS, its like proforma said in another article, it's VERY doubtful they had the thumbs up from DC to use the 'Batman' name/logo in the 1st place so this is ridiculous. I wonder if someone can counter sue them on behalf of DC? THAT would be funny
    1. taniquetil's Avatar
      taniquetil -
      Yeah, that doesn't sound like blackmail at all...

      If you sue us, we will publicly accuse you of downloading our porn. Is there anyone on earth who believes that the choice of "Teen Anal Nightmare" was coincidental?
    1. darkmawl's Avatar
      darkmawl -
      I really never understand how people can be sued using an IP adress. If someone obtain my internet IP adress (and get my adress from my provider etc.), it in no-way has proof I actually downloaded or shared any files.

      I am not sure how this legaly applies though. Am I responcible for all the netword trafic on my internet/IP adress? If I am not then they actually can not proof it was me who downloaded the files.

      I do not even believe many cases that actually gone trough where won, but sure many husbands would prefer to pay a couple of dollars instead of having there wifes hear of there choice of video.
    1. darkstate01's Avatar
      darkstate01 -
      I think this king of law firms has just placed itself to the top of the list of those hackers who like to ddos there websites, Advertising and shouting at the top of your voice (IN CAPITAL LETTERS) in a bullying manner has adverse effects these days on the web. DDOS ATTACK ANYONE