File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
I was just curious as to what the various file sharing alternatives were currently. I am also concerned about privacy. I came up with the following list of FS methods with their associated benefits and risks. I was hoping someone could help myself (and possibly others) understand the benefits/risks of the methods they might consider to share content.
Method/benefit/downside/risk
USENET
Very fast downloads, almost complete privacy/limited availability of content/almost no risk
Bit-torrent
A lot of available content with fellow user feedback on quality of dl/dls can be fast or slow (slower than UN)/Inherent risk of being identified as your IP is being shared with the rest of the world
FS site such as Hotfiles, etc.
A lot of available content/dl limits unless you become a "premium member"/I would really like to know the risks of using these types of sites
Please add other methods here and correct my perceptions above.
I was just wondering if there is something better out there ...
Thanks all.
Re: File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
Off the top of my head, BT, Usenet, DC hubs, IRC, Gnutella, DDL, FXP boards, FTP topsites and/or dumps, Slsk, I2P, probably like a hundred other proprietary protocols similar to Gnutella, etc.
Re: File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ca_aok
Off the top of my head, BT, Usenet, DC hubs, IRC, Gnutella, DDL, FXP boards, FTP topsites and/or dumps, Slsk, I2P, probably like a hundred other proprietary protocols similar to Gnutella, etc.
OK ... but what about the risks inherent with using each of these methods?
Re: File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
The least risk comes from anything that is S2P instead of P2P. So DDL links, IRC, and Usenet. Then anything swarm based with the possibility for anonymity, so something like BT, I2P, or whatever else. Finally, the most risk is direct P2P transfer, which is stuff like DC hubs, Slsk, Gnutella, etc, because if you download from or upload to an anti-P2P spook, they can more easily ID you.
Re: File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
but don't you have to pay for usenet...=downside.?
Re: File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
No, you don't have to pay for usenet, all the answers to that question can be found on this board.
Re: File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
filedud
FS site such as Hotfiles, etc.
A lot of available content/dl limits unless you become a "premium member"/I would really like to know the risks of using these types of sites
The only risk I can think of is the file hoster logging IPs and then handing them to the cops. But that's not very frequent, and even so uploaders would take more risk than downloaders.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
esco123
but don't you have to pay for usenet...=downside.?
I've been using Usenet quite a bit ever since I found out about Binload, a free server with good speeds and retention but which forces you to use their proprietary client. Read through this subforum a bit and you'll know how to use it on your favorite one, however. (I use SABnzbd)
Re: File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
Pointing out that like DDL, free usenet and paid usenet don't offer the same pros.
Re: File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
You could get into the scene... join a group.... get access to Topsites. You wont need bittorrent or p2p at all.
Re: File sharing alternatives ... what are they?
If it was that easy, everyone would be leeching from topsites.