Re: Sites ranked level 10
Honestly, in specialized trackers, specifically trackers that are the only in their class worth being mentioned, speed isn't an issue in rating. And I think a lot of the specialized trackers ratings are unjust because they're using the same system as 0-days/scene/seedbox trackers.
If you're downloading a file that you have no chance at downloading anywhere else, then in my eyes... you can wait a little longer.
Thus, KG and BlackCats should be 10s, easily.
BrokenStones also could be a 10.
What and Waffles are definitely not 10s. Maybe 7s, honestly. OiNK was a 10. Waffles and What just aren't there.
Re: Sites ranked level 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Grind$oFine
Honestly, in specialized trackers, specifically trackers that are the only in their class worth being mentioned, speed isn't an issue in rating. And I think a lot of the specialized trackers ratings are unjust because they're using the same system as 0-days/scene/seedbox trackers.
If you're downloading a file that you have no chance at downloading anywhere else, then in my eyes... you can wait a little longer.
Thus, KG and BlackCats should be 10s, easily.
+1 Couldnt have said it better myself .
Re: Sites ranked level 10
HDBits[10]
TL[10]
BitMeTV[10]
ScT[10]
TT[10]
FTN[10]
HDBits>>>>> Yes
TL>>>>>>>> Yes
BitMETV>>>> Yes
ScT>>>>>>> Yes
TT>>>>>>>> I donīt know, Iīm not a member.
FTN>>>>>>> Yes.
And there are others sites that deserve 10 as well.
Re: Sites ranked level 10
What Polar Bear said... ;)
Re: Sites ranked level 10
scc should be a lvl 10 i think.
Re: Sites ranked level 10
TL, TT, and bitmetv deserve the 10 rankings, i wouldnt know on the others sites, because im not a member, but these trackers are truly deserving of the 10, cant really comment on SCT as i dont use it profusely like i do with my other ones ive mentioned
Re: Sites ranked level 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DanielleD87
scc should be a lvl 10 i think.
yeah, the rating/ranking.
SCC has the best pretime.
Re: Sites ranked level 10
What others have already hinted at is. Isn't how good the content of a tracker differ from person to person depending on there interests and what they need or want? So if it is relative for each person it would be impossible to give a straight answer.
Now if your going by generalities and what the majority says well then yes, they deserve a 10.
Re: Sites ranked level 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Polarbear
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fusionz
NO! I am not talking about the rarity level, what i want to discuss is the
[Content,Speed,Pre-Times] sites. which are :
HDBits[10]
TL[10]
BitMeTV[10]
ScT[10]
TT[10]
FTN[10]
Do you think these sites deserve the Perfect 10 ( based on content, speed and pre times not anything else ) ?
Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?
// edit : What do you think What and Waffles should be rated ?
looking at content, speed and pretimes:
hdbits: is there a better hd site? :noes:
tl, sct, ftn: are there better 0-day sites? :noes:
bitmetv: is there a better tv site? :noes:
tt: is there a better site for trance? :noes:
that's why they all deserve the best [10].
Exactly......also SCC is a deserved 10 when it comes to 0-day trackers. BIT-HDTV is a close 10 as well in my opinion when it comes to HD stuff
Re: Sites ranked level 10
