Printable View
I thought the KT600 Was on comparison level with the Nforce chipsets, not the 400.Quote:
Originally posted by DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 13:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular
I would definently get nForce 2. Works great with my Radeon 9700Pro.
I thought the KT600 Was on comparison level with the Nforce chipsets, not the 400. [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by _John_Lennon_+31 January 2004 - 11:52--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (_John_Lennon_ @ 31 January 2004 - 11:52)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 13:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular
John, check em out if you have time :D I don't :(
http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherb...814/index.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/motherbo...417/index.html
http://www20.tomshardware.com/motherboard/...1boards-01.html
http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherb...007/index.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20030701..._tuning-02.html
The last one has some info....didn't bother to look at it...
Bye :D
the only problem is that the agb bus has to be set to 66mhz in the bios when u r overclocking but as long as u do that then u have no problems