Quote:
Originally Posted by EyeCandy
Whats the B-F-Deal in bumping a 4yrs old thread ?Quote:
Originally Posted by anon-sbi
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by EyeCandy
Whats the B-F-Deal in bumping a 4yrs old thread ?Quote:
Originally Posted by anon-sbi
Never had my account disabled on any tracker because of my ratio. I only had them disabled for other reasons.
Please stop.Quote:
Originally Posted by OlegL
It was just one sentence. :)
I don't see the need to do it. If he wants to say "fuck BCG", he can start a new thread himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Evelyn
LOL language barrier....anon doesn't understand that Evelyn's comment was directed towards me.
He's quoting me as well, so that's debatable. :happy:
I thought you were the one, Evelyn, who bumped an 8 year old thread a little over a week agoQuote:
Originally Posted by EvelynWhats the B-F-Deal in bumping a 4yrs old thread ?Quote:
Originally Posted by anon-sbi
It was two you fucking dolt.Quote:
Originally Posted by OlegL
I suggest renaming FST to Planet of the Apes for as more time passes clearer the monkeys rule.
yes :)Quote:
Originally Posted by EyeCandy
he bumped a old thread & you thanking him, i quoted you with a huge invisible "Question mark" of why.Quote:
Originally Posted by anon-sbi
Sarcasm, my friend, sarcasm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Evelyn
BlackCats is the BEST in my opinion:D
doesn't matter what anyone else says
"Grapes will always be sour" for them:rolleyes:
As this has been bumped i will answer.
back then you didnt get any seedpoints for being unconnectable (unless you donated), then we changed it to 1/2 the sp for being unconnectable (unless you donated), now you get the same as connectable people (even without donating).
so yes back then you probably got banned when you shouldnt have done (or you could have donated and not got banned), now its very very hard to get banned on BCG.
longue vie à BCG !
i miss my account lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth RingsIt was two you fucking dolt.Quote:
Originally Posted by OlegL
Let me respond to your accusation that I am two-faced. You made this statement:
I didn't want to see anyone suffer. My hdbits ratio wasn't below 0.45 (and 0.45 is the ratio you are required to keep on hdbits to avoid getting banned). That's why I felt people would actually listen to me if I asked them to consider mjmacky as a potential invitee. Don't forget that IT REQUIRES ALMOST ZERO INTELLIGENCE TO BE A GOOD MEMBER OF ANY TRACKER. Hdbits is not Harvard. Hdbits is not an Ivy League university. It's just a tracker where you are required to keep a minimum ratio to avoid getting banned. After I read a couple of mjmacky's posts, I felt that he would be intelligent enough to keep his ratio at the level that wouldn't be below minimum. Maybe he's already an hdbits member. So, I have no clue why you think I am insincere. You also said that you treat people in a more realistic way than I do. If it's true, why did you suddenly change your attitude toward me? One time you called me an upstanding guy. Why? Another time you called me a sociopath. Why?Quote:
My reply: It's because you're a two faced idiot. You know exactly what holes you dig yourself to, but you play a pathetic mind game that you know you couldn't possibly lose. Your winning is getting a reaction out of people. Whatever that reaction may be. You and I know full well that the only reason you vouched for mjmacky is because you knew he wouldn't get invited by that method, but you just would rather see him suffer and blame you for it, than honestly get into HDBits.
So go ahead. Act like a further idiot that doesn't understand me or what I'm saying, because you think that makes you win your mind game. Then act like a victim when someone like me comes along (or someone like Valerio can't deal with your shit anymore) and trap the next person into your meaningless drivel. I'll just be fine and happy knowing that I treat people in a much more realistic and respectable way than you do; regardless of whether I act abrasive occasionally or not.
I still don't understand how that makes you hate BlackcatsQuote:
Originally Posted by OlegL
I don't hate BCG. I love it. Stoi is a great guy.
No offence OlegL, but wouldn't it have been better if you'd just responded to Darth Rings' post in the appropriate thread, rather than turning this thread into a battle between you and him.
Wait what does this have to do with me? I remember you asking on my behalf, and no I'm not a member there. However, I'm not exactly putting much effort into it either (not that there is anything I would be doing). My interest in HDBits relates to their HDTV captures, which I can use for source.Quote:
Originally Posted by OlegL
But again, what exactly does this have to do with me?
He accused me of being insincere when he wrote that particular post. I guess he meant that my effort to make you an hdbits member was insincere. Since he didn't respond to me in the other thread that I had recently bumped, I was forced to respond to his accusations in this thread, because that's where he had called me again a "fucking dolt".Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyWait what does this have to do with me? I remember you asking on my behalf, and no I'm not a member there. However, I'm not exactly putting much effort into it either (not that there is anything I would be doing). My interest in HDBits relates to their HDTV captures, which I can use for source.Quote:
Originally Posted by OlegL
But again, what exactly does this have to do with me?
Plus one.Quote:
Originally Posted by man_utd
I think giving slightly less SP to unconnectable users would be a good incentive to make them forward their ports. While not always the case (some ISPs like giving you hybrid modems with passworded settings that can't be changed around here, for example), some people are NATed simply because they have no knowledge about the matter. A big warning about how they aren't reachable by other users and therefore getting less "bang for their buck" would help fix that, I'd say.Quote:
Originally Posted by stoi
Plus two.Quote:
Originally Posted by man_utd
Edited, nevermind.
Well that was the idea, ut most just didnt bother or complained instead lol also the tracker was never 100% reliable in detecting it, so we took it off.Quote:
I think giving slightly less SP to unconnectable users would be a good incentive to make them forward their ports. While not always the case (some ISPs like giving you hybrid modems with passworded settings that can't be changed around here, for example), some people are NATed simply because they have no knowledge about the matter. A big warning about how they aren't reachable by other users and therefore getting less "bang for their buck" would help fix that, I'd say.
Yeah, I forgot that. The connectability checker isn't always perfect. Gazelle's tended to fail a lot last time I checked.Quote:
Originally Posted by stoi
@stoi: Why doesn't EyeCandy like BCG that much?
He admitted to me in a PM that he is just a troll and likes getting me to bite, i dont think it has anything to do with liking or disliking anything to do with BCG (me included). But i still bite lol
after i told him he was one of the members on here that gets right on my nerves lolQuote:
LOL, dude, its ok...its an alias for a reason....free reign to troll and pass the time
Okay, you may be right about it, but he hurt me so much by his sudden change in his behavior that I try to make every attempt possible to convince him to return to his former self in terms of his behavior. He made a response to one of my posts in this thread; that's why I responded to him back. But yeah, let's get back to the conversation about BCG. It's a great tracker and I am surprised that someone decided to start an angry thread about it in 2007.Quote:
Originally Posted by man_utd
P.S. Damn... I definitely feel there is something wrong with my English. I really need to read books more often to improve my English.
I'm not, I was kicked by Stoi, personally, from the tracker about that time....Quote:
Originally Posted by OlegL
Your English looks pretty good to me. If you want to improve your skills, it's a good idea to practice on a daily basis. Read books as you said, watch subtitled movies, lurk and post on forums, even play videogames - that sort of stuff can help improve your grammar and vocabulary.Quote:
Originally Posted by OlegL
well you must have deserved it, i think in 7 years i have banned about 10 members, and every single one deserved it imho.
why was the title changed, I thought it had a nice ring to it lol
The better question is: Why wasn't this post auto-merged with your last, and if there is a time limit for auto-merge, how long is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by stoi
I hate auto-merge.
Because as with any site, the staff back then was ok with free speech, and the new current staff is oppressive.Quote:
Originally Posted by stoi
not a clue on here, but i like automergeQuote:
Originally Posted by shipwreckThe better question is: Why wasn't this post auto-merged with your last, and if there is a time limit for auto-merge, how long is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by stoi
I hate auto-merge.
A: stops people spamming crap just to get post count up
B: if it has falling down the page, automerge will bump it back to the top, but wihtout a double post (thats how it works on IPB anyway).
as for free speech, there is no such thing im afaraid.
Don't know the exact value, but from my observations it must be somewhere between 8 and 12 hours.Quote:
Originally Posted by shipwreck
stoi: double post merging doesn't bump threads in this forum.
And that's exactly why I hate it, not just here.Quote:
Originally Posted by anon-sbi
Yeah but you could easily abuse it. Auto-merge bump, edit out the new post. It's like a free bump button for last poster. Well not that abusive I guessQuote:
Originally Posted by shipwreckAnd that's exactly why I hate it, not just here.Quote:
Originally Posted by anon-sbi
Let's be frank, those posters who post just to get their postcount up are retards. Of course most of them do it because they want to get access to the invite section, but maybe it's about time to get rid of that restriction for good? This forum is not exactly being overrun by spammers. If anything, it could do with more activity / posts, even stupid ones.
on bcg automerge is set to 3 days, make a post, bumps to the top of the forum, wait 2 days, make another, it merges it and bumps it back to the top, a lot better than double posts all over the place (like mine was, i hate double posts lol)